Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Leach
This text of 330 S.E.2d 596 (Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Leach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
When Terry Leach failed to appear at the call of his lawsuit for trial, counsel for defendant Aetna Casualty and Surety Co. (hereinafter, Aetna) moved to dismiss his complaint. The superior court granted the motion, dismissing the complaint “with prejudice for want of prosecution pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-41 (b).” The Court of Appeals reversed, on the ground that, under the 1982 amendment to OCGA § 9-11-41 (b), Ga. L. 1982, p. 784 (eff. Nov. 1, 1982), trial courts are no longer authorized by § 9-11-41 (b) to enter dismissals with prejudice for the failure of the plaintiff to prosecute. Leach v. Aetna Cas. &c. Co., 172 Ga. App. 785 (324 SE2d 494) (1984). We granted Aetna’s application for a writ of certiorari, in order to review the holding of the Court of Appeals. For the reasons stated in the Court of Appeals’ opinion, we agree with the court’s holding, and affirm.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
330 S.E.2d 596, 254 Ga. 265, 1985 Ga. LEXIS 801, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aetna-casualty-surety-co-v-leach-ga-1985.