Adams v. State

102 S.E. 902, 25 Ga. App. 190, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 682
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 13, 1920·No. 11264·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

Under the undisputed facts of this case, the circumstantial evidence relied upon to convict the defendant failed to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of his guilt; and, therefore, his conviction was contrary to law and the evidence.

Judgment reversed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. Frank H. Harris, for plaintiff in error. F. M, Scarlett Jr,, solicitor, contra:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adams v. State, 102 S.E. 902, 25 Ga. App. 190, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 682 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

102 S.E. 902 (Adams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Boyd v. State
177 S.E.2d 184 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)