Adams v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Adams v. State

100 S.E. 785, 24 Ga. App. 352, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 648

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Adams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 22 Ga. App. 252 →

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 4, 1919·No. 10851·Published

Opinion

Luke, J.

This case is here upon the sole assignment of error that the evidence does not authorize the verdict. The State, made a ease by tlie witnesses offered to prove the crime. The defendant by his witness and statement contradicted the evidence offered by the State. The jury believed the witnesses for the State and convicted the defendant. The trial judge has approved the verdict. The judgment overruling the motion for a new trial must be

Affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

This case is here upon the sole assignment of error that the evidence does not authorize the verdict. The State, made a ease by tlie witnesses offered to prove the crime. The defendant by his witness and statement contradicted the evidence offered by the State. The jury believed the witnesses for the State and convicted the defendant. The trial judge has approved the verdict. The judgment overruling the motion for a new trial must be

Affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Adams v. State, 100 S.E. 785, 24 Ga. App. 352, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 648 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

100 S.E. 785 (Adams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.