Adams v. State

669 So. 2d 284, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 904, 1996 WL 47685
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 7, 1996
DocketNos. 94-2650, 94-2992
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 669 So. 2d 284 (Adams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adams v. State, 669 So. 2d 284, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 904, 1996 WL 47685 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Adams appeals an order denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We conclude that the second element of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), has not been satisfied, namely, even if defense counsel had taken the additional steps identified in appellant’s motion, there is no reasonable probability that the trial outcome would have [285]*285been different. See 466 U.S. at 694, 104 S.Ct. at 2068.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lanier v. State
709 So. 2d 112 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
669 So. 2d 284, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 904, 1996 WL 47685, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.