Adams v. State
Opinion
Lonzine ADAMS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Amy Porinchak Thornhill, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Susan D. Dunlevy, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Lonzine Adams appeals his judgment and sentence for possession of cocaine with the intent to sell. We affirm his conviction. The trial court did not err in permitting an experienced narcotics officer to testify that the quantity of crack cocaine and the circumstances of its possession were consistent with possession with the intent to sell, as contrasted with simple possession. See Bruce v. State, 616 So.2d 504 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993).
*774 We strike the $2 cost imposed pursuant to section 943.25(13), Florida Statutes (1993), because the trial court did not announce this discretionary cost at sentencing. See Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).
DANAHY, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
696 So. 2d 773 (Adams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.