Adams v. State
669 So. 2d 284, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 904, 1996 WL 47685
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 7, 1996·No. Nos. 94-2650, 94-2992·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Anthony Adams appeals an order denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We conclude that the second element of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), has not been satisfied, namely, even if defense counsel had taken the additional steps identified in appellant’s motion, there is no reasonable probability that the trial outcome would have [285]*285been different. See 466 U.S. at 694, 104 S.Ct. at 2068.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Adams v. State, 669 So. 2d 284, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 904, 1996 WL 47685 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
669 So. 2d 284 (Adams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lanier v. State
709 So. 2d 112 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)