Adamar of New Jersey v. Director, Division of Taxation

18 N.J. Tax 70
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division·Decided February 5, 1999·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Kuskin in the opinion of the Tax Court reported at 17 N.J. Tax 80 (1997).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adamar of New Jersey v. Director, Division of Taxation, 18 N.J. Tax 70 (N.J. Ct. App. 1999).

18 N.J. Tax 70 (Adamar of New Jersey v. Director, Division of Taxation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Atlantic City Showboat, Inc. v. Director
26 N.J. Tax 234 (New Jersey Tax Court, 2012)
Advo, Inc. v. Director, Division of Taxation
25 N.J. Tax 504 (New Jersey Tax Court, 2010)
Tozour Energy Systems, Inc. v. Director, Division of Taxation
23 N.J. Tax 341 (New Jersey Tax Court, 2007)
UPS Oasis Supply Corp. v. Director, Division of Taxation
23 N.J. Tax 320 (New Jersey Tax Court, 2007)
Quest Diagnostics, Inc. v. Director of Taxation
903 A.2d 442 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2006)
Sodexho Operations, LLC v. Director, Division of Taxation
21 N.J. Tax 24 (New Jersey Tax Court, 2003)