Adam Nyman v. Thomson Reuters Holdings Inc

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided May 20, 2020·No. 160376·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

May 20, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

160376 David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

ADAM NYMAN and SARA NYMAN, Richard H. Bernstein Plaintiffs-Appellants, Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

v SC: 160376 COA: 344213 Wayne CC: 17-012847-CB

THOMSON REUTERS HOLDINGS, INC., d/b/a WESTLAW, Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 3, 2019 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 20, 2020

a0513

Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adam Nyman v. Thomson Reuters Holdings Inc, (Mich. 2020).

Adam Nyman v. Thomson Reuters Holdings Inc (Adam Nyman v. Thomson Reuters Holdings Inc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.