Adam Nyman v. Thomson Reuters Holdings Inc
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
May 20, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
160376 David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem
Stephen J. Markman
Brian K. Zahra
ADAM NYMAN and SARA NYMAN, Richard H. Bernstein Plaintiffs-Appellants, Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh,
Justices
v SC: 160376 COA: 344213 Wayne CC: 17-012847-CB
THOMSON REUTERS HOLDINGS, INC., d/b/a WESTLAW, Defendant-Appellee.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 3, 2019 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
May 20, 2020
a0513
Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Adam Nyman v. Thomson Reuters Holdings Inc (Adam Nyman v. Thomson Reuters Holdings Inc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.