Adam Nyman v. Thomson Reuters Holdings Inc
This text of Adam Nyman v. Thomson Reuters Holdings Inc (Adam Nyman v. Thomson Reuters Holdings Inc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
January 29, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem 160376(44) Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra ADAM NYMAN and SARA NYMAN, Richard H. Bernstein Plaintiffs-Appellants, Elizabeth T. Clement SC: 160376 Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices v COA: 344213 Wayne CC: 17-012847-CB THOMSON REUTERS HOLDINGS, INC., doing business as WESTLAW, Defendant-Appellee. _______________________________________/
On order of the Chief Justice, the motion for the temporary admission of out-of- state attorney Scott T. Lashway to appear and practice in this case under MCR 8.126(A) is GRANTED.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. January 29, 2020
Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Adam Nyman v. Thomson Reuters Holdings Inc, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adam-nyman-v-thomson-reuters-holdings-inc-mich-2020.