Adam Nyman v. Thomson Reuters Holdings Inc
This text of Adam Nyman v. Thomson Reuters Holdings Inc (Adam Nyman v. Thomson Reuters Holdings Inc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
November 15, 2019 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem 160376(38) Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Richard H. Bernstein ADAM NYMAN and SARA NYMAN, Elizabeth T. Clement Plaintiffs-Appellants, Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices SC: 160376 v COA: 344213 Wayne CC: 17-012847-CB THOMSON REUTERS HOLDINGS, INC., doing business as WESTLAW, Defendant-Appellee. __________________________________________/
On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellee to extend the time for filing its answer is GRANTED. The answer submitted on November 13, 2019, is accepted as timely filed.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. November 15, 2019
Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Adam Nyman v. Thomson Reuters Holdings Inc, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adam-nyman-v-thomson-reuters-holdings-inc-mich-2019.