Adair v. State

427 S.W.2d 67, 1967 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 775
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 27, 1967
Docket40795
StatusPublished
Cited by30 cases

This text of 427 S.W.2d 67 (Adair v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adair v. State, 427 S.W.2d 67, 1967 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 775 (Tex. 1967).

Opinions

OPINION

DICE, Judge.

The conviction is for unlawfully carrying a pistol; the punishment, a fine of $101.

Trial was before the court, a jury being waived, upon appellant’s plea of not guilty.

The evidence shows that the pistol was recovered from underneath the arm rest in the middle of the front seat of appellant’s automobile by a City of Dallas police officer on the occasion of his arrest for a moving traffic violation.

It was further shown that prior to the search, the appellant “kept getting in front” of the officer as he walked toward the automobile, which actions aroused the officer’s suspicions and indicated to him that appellant was trying to hide something.

In his brief, appellant urges one ground of error, designated as a proposition of law, which is as follows:

“The search of the defendant’s automobile was unreasonable in violation of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States for the reason that said search was not based upon probable cause.”

Recently, in Lane v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 424 S.W.2d 925, Cause No. 40,222, opinion delivered April 12, 1967, not yet reported, this court overruled a similar contention in upholding the search of an automobile, incident to the arrest of the driver for a traffic violation, which led to the finding of a pistol in the glove compartment.

We adhere to such holding, and overrule appellant’s contention.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Crittenden v. State
899 S.W.2d 668 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1995)
Gordon v. State
801 S.W.2d 899 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1990)
State v. Garcia
794 S.W.2d 472 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1990)
Black v. State
739 S.W.2d 240 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1987)
Dodson v. State
646 S.W.2d 177 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1983)
Duncantell v. State
563 S.W.2d 252 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1978)
Beck v. State
547 S.W.2d 266 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1976)
Hooper v. State
533 S.W.2d 762 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1976)
Trusley v. State
505 S.W.2d 861 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1974)
Lewis v. State
502 S.W.2d 699 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1973)
Medina v. State
493 S.W.2d 151 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1973)
State v. Curtis
190 N.W.2d 631 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1971)
Wallace v. State
467 S.W.2d 608 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1971)
Elliott v. State
450 S.W.2d 863 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1970)
Corbitt v. State
445 S.W.2d 184 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1969)
Wimberly v. State
434 S.W.2d 857 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1968)
Adair v. State
427 S.W.2d 67 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
427 S.W.2d 67, 1967 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 775, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adair-v-state-texcrimapp-1967.