Activevideo Networks, Inc. v. Verizon Communications, Inc.

Federal Circuit

Activevideo Networks, Inc. v. Verizon Communications, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedFebruary 8, 2012

Docket2011-1538

StatusUnpublished

This text of Activevideo Networks, Inc. v. Verizon Communications, Inc. (Activevideo Networks, Inc. v. Verizon Communications, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Activevideo Networks, Inc. v. Verizon Communications, Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: ThiS order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit ACTIVEVIDEO NETWORKS, INC., Plaintiff-C'ross Appellcmt, a V. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC., VERIZON SERVICES CORP., VERIZON VIRGINIA INC., AND VERIZON SOUTH INC., Defendants-Appellants. n 2011-1538, -1567, 2012-1129, -1201 Appea1s from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in case no. 10-CV-0248, Judge Raym0nd A. Jackson. ON MOTION ORDER Up0n consideration of Veriz0n Com1nunications, Inc. et a1.’s unopposed motion to consolidate appeal no. 2012- 1201 with appeal nos. 2011~1538, 2011-1567, and 2012- 1129,

ACTIVEVIDEO V. V`ERIZON COM]VIUNICATION 2 IT IS ORDERED THAT2 The motion is granted The revised official caption is reflected above. FEB 08 2012 FoR THE CoURT lsi J an Horbaly Date J an Horba1y Clerk ‘ cc: Michael J. Ly0ns, Esq. Michael K. Kel1ogg, Esq. s19 FlLED U.S. COURT DF APPEALS FDH THE FEDER.AL ClRCUlT FEB 0 8 2012 ih\\\H0nBALv cLEm<

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NOTE: ThiS order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit ACTIVEVIDEO NETWORKS, INC., Plaintiff-C'ross Appellcmt, a V. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC., VERIZON SERVICES CORP., VERIZON VIRGINIA INC., AND VERIZON SOUTH INC., Defendants-Appellants. n 2011-1538, -1567, 2012-1129, -1201 Appea1s from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in case no. 10-CV-0248, Judge Raym0nd A. Jackson. ON MOTION ORDER Up0n consideration of Veriz0n Com1nunications, Inc. et a1.’s unopposed motion to consolidate appeal no. 2012- 1201 with appeal nos. 2011~1538, 2011-1567, and 2012- 1129,

ACTIVEVIDEO V. V`ERIZON COM]VIUNICATION 2 IT IS ORDERED THAT2 The motion is granted The revised official caption is reflected above. FEB 08 2012 FoR THE CoURT lsi J an Horbaly Date J an Horba1y Clerk ‘ cc: Michael J. Ly0ns, Esq. Michael K. Kel1ogg, Esq. s19 FlLED U.S. COURT DF APPEALS FDH THE FEDER.AL ClRCUlT FEB 0 8 2012 ih\\\H0nBALv cLEm<

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Activevideo Networks, Inc. v. Verizon Communications, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/activevideo-networks-inc-v-verizon-communications-inc-cafc-2012.