Allele Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedAugust 3, 2022
Docket7:20-cv-08255
StatusUnknown

This text of Allele Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Allele Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Allele Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., (S.D.N.Y. 2022).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ALLELE BIOTECHNOLOGY AND PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY Plaintiff, AGREEMENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER v. Case No. 7:20-cv-08255 (PMH) (AEK) REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Defendant. PHILIP M. HALPERN, United States District Judge: WHEREAS, all the parties to this action (collectively the “Parties” and individually a “Party”) request that this Court issue a protective order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) to protect the confidentiality of nonpublic and competitively sensitive information that they may need to disclose in connection with discovery in the above captioned action; WHEREAS, the Parties, through counsel, agree to the following terms; and WHEREAS, this Court finds good cause exists for issuance of an appropriately tailored confidentiality order governing the pretrial phase of this action, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that any person subject to this Order1 – including without limitation the Parties to this action (including their respective corporate parents, successors, and assigns), their representatives, agents, experts and consultants, all third parties

1 A redline showing the differences between this Order and the Court’s Model Protective Order (available at https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/practice_documents/ PMH%20Halpern%20-%20ModelProtectiveOrder.pdf) is attached as Exhibit C. providing discovery in this action, and all other interested persons with actual or constructive notice of this Order — will adhere to the following terms, upon pain of contempt: 1. With respect to “Discovery Material” (i.e., information of any kind produced or disclosed in the course of discovery in this action) that a person has designated pursuant to this Order, no person subject to this Order may disclose such designated Discovery

Material to anyone else except as this Order expressly permits: 2. The Party or person producing or disclosing Discovery Material (“Producing Party”) may designate as “Confidential” only the portion of such material, unless the entire document contains Confidential Discovery Material, that it reasonably and in good faith believes consists of: (a) previously non-disclosed financial information (including without limitation profitability reports or estimates, percentage fees, design fees, royalty rates, minimum guarantee payments, sales reports, and sale margins);

(b) previously non-disclosed material relating to ownership or control of any non-public company; (c) previously non-disclosed business plans, product-development information, or marketing plans; (d) any information of a personal or intimate nature regarding any individual; or (e) any other category of information this Court subsequently affords confidential status. 3. The Producing Party may designate as “Highly Confidential” only the portion of such material, unless the entire document contains Highly Confidential Discovery Material, that it reasonably and in good faith believes consists of: (a) information considered to be most sensitive by the party, including but not limited to trade secret or other confidential research, development,

financial, or other commercial information; or (b) current or ongoing trade secrets and other commercially sensitive research and development or technical data or information, including for past, present, and future products and projects. 4. With respect to the designated portion of any Discovery Material other than deposition transcripts and exhibits, the Producing Party or its counsel may designate such portion by: (a) stamping or otherwise clearly marking as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” the protected portion in a manner that will not interfere with legibility or audibility; and (b) producing for future public use another copy of said Discovery Material with the confidential

information redacted. When a document is Confidential or Highly Confidential in its entirety, such document should be marked “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” on the bottom of each page. 5. A Producing Party or its counsel may designate deposition exhibits or portions of deposition transcripts under this Order either by: (a) indicating on the record during the deposition that a question calls for Confidential or Highly Confidential information, in which case the reporter will bind the transcript of the designated testimony in a separate volume and mark it as “[Highly] Confidential Information Governed by Protective Order”; or (b) notifying the reporter and all counsel of record, in writing, within 30 days after a deposition has concluded, of the specific pages and lines of the transcript that are to be designated “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential,” in which case all counsel receiving the transcript will be responsible for marking the copies of the designated transcript in their possession or under their control as directed by the Producing Party or that person’s counsel. During the 30-day period following a deposition, all Parties will treat the entire deposition transcript as if it had been designated as

“Highly Confidential” under this Order. 6. If at any time before the trial of this action a Producing Party realizes that it should have designated under this Order some portion(s) of Discovery Material that it previously produced without limitation, the Producing Party may so designate such material by so apprising all prior recipients in writing. Thereafter, this Court and all persons subject to this Order will treat such designated portion(s) of the Discovery Material in accordance with said designation. 7. Nothing contained in this Order will be construed as: (a) a waiver by a Party or person of its right to object to any discovery request; (b) a waiver of any privilege or

protection; or (c) a ruling regarding the admissibility at trial of any document, testimony, or other evidence. 8. Where a Producing Party has designated Discovery Material as Confidential, other persons subject to this Order may disclose such information only to the following persons: (a) outside counsel retained specifically for this action, including any paralegal, clerical, or other assistant that such outside counsel employs and assigns to this matter; (b) two total designated Party Representatives (inclusive of those designated under Section 9(b)), who, because of their duties and responsibilities, require access to Confidential Discovery Material. Designated Party Representatives are to be designated according to the following procedure: During the pendency of this action, a Party that seeks to designate a Party

Representative or designate a replacement Party Representative with a new designee, must first make a written request by execution of the declaration in the form annexed as Exhibit B hereto to the other Party. A Party that makes a request to designate or replace a designated Party Representative and provides an executed and completed Exhibit B to the other Party’s outside counsel may disclose Confidential Discovery Material to the newly designated Party Representative after ten (10) days of delivering the executed Exhibit B (as calculated by Fed. R. Civ. P. 6), unless within that ten (10) day period, the Party receives a written

objection from the objecting Party. Any such objection must set forth in detail the grounds on which such objection is based and be made in good faith. A Party that receives a timely written objection must meet and confer with the objecting Party to attempt to resolve the matter. Following the meet and confer, the objecting Party may apply to the Court for a protective order or other appropriate relief no later than fifteen (15) days (as calculated by Fed. R. Civ. P.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
435 F.3d 110 (Second Circuit, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Allele Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allele-biotechnology-and-pharmaceuticals-inc-v-regeneron-nysd-2022.