Actavis Mid Atlantic LLC and Actavis Elizabeth LLC v. State of Texas and Ven-A-Care of the Florida Keys, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 4, 2012
Docket07-11-00260-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Actavis Mid Atlantic LLC and Actavis Elizabeth LLC v. State of Texas and Ven-A-Care of the Florida Keys, Inc. (Actavis Mid Atlantic LLC and Actavis Elizabeth LLC v. State of Texas and Ven-A-Care of the Florida Keys, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Actavis Mid Atlantic LLC and Actavis Elizabeth LLC v. State of Texas and Ven-A-Care of the Florida Keys, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

NO. 07-11-0260-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

APRIL 4, 2012

______________________________

ACTAVIS MID ATLANTIC LLC AND ACTAVIS ELIZABETH LLC, APPELLANTS

V.

STATE OF TEXAS AND VEN-A-CARE OF THE FLORIDA KEYS, INC., APPELLEES

_________________________________

FROM THE 419TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY;1

NO. D-1-GV-08-001566; HONORABLE LORA J. LIVINGSTON, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before this Court is the parties' Agreed Motion to Set Aside the

Judgment Without Regard to the Merits and Remand the Case to the Trial Court in

which they represent that they have reached a settlement of all disputes.

1 Originally appealed to the Third Court of Appeals, this appeal was transferred to this Court by the Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 73.001 (West 2005). To accord the trial court with jurisdiction to accomplish the relief requested by the

parties and effectuate the settlement agreement, we grant the motion and, without

passing on the merits of the appeal, set aside the trial court=s judgment and remand the

cause to the trial court for rendition of judgment. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B).

See also Sutton v. Horseshoe Hills, Ltd., 278 S.W.3d 923 (Tex.App.BHouston [14th Dist.

2009, no pet.); Vigil v. Montero, 225 S.W.3d 271 (Tex.App.BEl Paso 2006, no pet.).

Having set aside the judgment at the request of the parties, no motion for rehearing will

be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.

Patrick A. Pirtle Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sutton v. Horseshoe Hills, Ltd.
278 S.W.3d 923 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2009)
Vigil v. Montero
225 S.W.3d 271 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Actavis Mid Atlantic LLC and Actavis Elizabeth LLC v. State of Texas and Ven-A-Care of the Florida Keys, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/actavis-mid-atlantic-llc-and-actavis-elizabeth-llc-texapp-2012.