Vigil v. Montero

Court of Appeals of Texas

Vigil v. Montero

225 S.W.3d 271, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 3006, 2006 WL 957101

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedApril 13, 2006

Docket08-05-00336-CV

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 225 S.W.3d 271 (Vigil v. Montero) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vigil v. Montero, 225 S.W.3d 271, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 3006, 2006 WL 957101 (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Justice.

Pending before the Court is a joint motion to remand, requesting that this Court remand the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties compromise and settlement agreement. See Tex.R.App.P. 42.1(a)(2)(B).

On October 18, 2005, this Court referred the parties to mediation pursuant to Tex. CivPraC. & Rem.Code Ann. 154.021, et. seq. A mediation was held on November 22, 2005, but the case did not settled during the mediation. However, the parties represent that since mediation, the parties have continued discussions and negotiations of the matter and have now reached an agreement compromising and settling the underlying claim. The Court has considered this cause on the parties motion and concludes the motion should be GRANTED.

Accordingly, we set aside the trial courts judgment without regard to the merits and remand this cause to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties compromise and settlement agreement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Justice.

Pending before the Court is a joint motion to remand, requesting that this Court remand the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties compromise and settlement agreement. See Tex.R.App.P. 42.1(a)(2)(B).

On October 18, 2005, this Court referred the parties to mediation pursuant to Tex. CivPraC. & Rem.Code Ann. 154.021, et. seq. A mediation was held on November 22, 2005, but the case did not settled during the mediation. However, the parties represent that since mediation, the parties have continued discussions and negotiations of the matter and have now reached an agreement compromising and settling the underlying claim. The Court has considered this cause on the parties motion and concludes the motion should be GRANTED.

Accordingly, we set aside the trial courts judgment without regard to the merits and remand this cause to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties compromise and settlement agreement.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

225 S.W.3d 271, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 3006, 2006 WL 957101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vigil-v-montero-texapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack