Sutton v. Horseshoe Hills, Ltd.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Sutton v. Horseshoe Hills, Ltd.

278 S.W.3d 923, 2009 Tex. App. LEXIS 1106, 2009 WL 396219

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 19, 2009·No. 14-07-00723-CV·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

OPINION

EVA M. GUZMAN, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment signed June 14, 2007. On February 9, 2009, the parties filed a joint motion to set aside or vacate the judgment and remand the cause to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties’ settlement agreement. See Tex.R.App. P. 42.1. The motion is granted.

Accordingly, we vacate the judgment signed June 14, 2007, and we remand the cause to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

EVA M. GUZMAN, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment signed June 14, 2007. On February 9, 2009, the parties filed a joint motion to set aside or vacate the judgment and remand the cause to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties’ settlement agreement. See Tex.R.App. P. 42.1. The motion is granted.

Accordingly, we vacate the judgment signed June 14, 2007, and we remand the cause to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement.

Sutton v. Horseshoe Hills, Ltd., 278 S.W.3d 923, 2009 Tex. App. LEXIS 1106, 2009 WL 396219 (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

278 S.W.3d 923 (Sutton v. Horseshoe Hills, Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related