Acosta v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided October 25, 2023·No. 1:22-cv-01774·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------x ROBERT ACOSTA,

Movant, 22-cv-1774 (PKC)

-against-

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent. ---------------------------------------------------------------------x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 18-cr-80 (PKC) -against- JUDGMENT

ROBERT ACOSTA,

Defendant. ---------------------------------------------------------------------x

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated October 24, 2023, the Court has considered the entirety of Acosta's arguments and finds them to be without merit. His motion to vacate, set aside or correct his conviction and sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is DENIED. Acosta has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, and accordingly, a certificate of appealability will not issue. 28 U.S.C. § 2253; see Blackman v. Ercole, 661 F.3d 161, 163-64 (2d Cir. 2011). The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). DATED: New York, New York October 25, 2023

RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court

BY: ER Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Acosta v. United States, (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Acosta v. United States (Acosta v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)
Blackman v. Ercole
661 F.3d 161 (Second Circuit, 2011)