Acosta v. Phillips

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Acosta v. Phillips

193 A.D.2d 732, 598 N.Y.S.2d 991

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 17, 1993

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 193 A.D.2d 732 (Acosta v. Phillips) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Acosta v. Phillips, 193 A.D.2d 732, 598 N.Y.S.2d 991 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the District Attorney, Orange County, dated July 17, 1990, which denied the petitioner’s request for disclosure pursuant to the Freedom of Information Law (Public Officers Law § 84 et seq.), the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (LaCava, J.), dated January 30, 1991, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner was not entitled to the requested information as it had been sealed pursuant to CPL 160.50 (1) (see, Public Officers Law § 87 [2] [a]). Bracken, J. P., Balletta, Fiber, O’Brien and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the District Attorney, Orange County, dated July 17, 1990, which denied the petitioner’s request for disclosure pursuant to the Freedom of Information Law (Public Officers Law § 84 et seq.), the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (LaCava, J.), dated January 30, 1991, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner was not entitled to the requested information as it had been sealed pursuant to CPL 160.50 (1) (see, Public Officers Law § 87 [2] [a]). Bracken, J. P., Balletta, Fiber, O’Brien and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

193 A.D.2d 732, 598 N.Y.S.2d 991, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/acosta-v-phillips-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack