A.C. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

A.C. v. State

837 So. 2d 570, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1405, 2003 WL 289521

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 12, 2003·No. No. 4D02-1073·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s restitution order. However, we modify that portion of the order that required appellant to begin paying restitution on March 15, 2002, at a time when appellant was committed to a level six program. We modify that portion of the restitution order to provide that appellant shall begin paying restitution at a rate of $30 per month upon securing employment and that he shall make every reasonable effort to secure employment upon release from the level six program. See In re B.S., 616 So.2d 1231 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Rimmer v. State, 601 So.2d 318 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).

STONE, GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s restitution order. However, we modify that portion of the order that required appellant to begin paying restitution on March 15, 2002, at a time when appellant was committed to a level six program. We modify that portion of the restitution order to provide that appellant shall begin paying restitution at a rate of $30 per month upon securing employment and that he shall make every reasonable effort to secure employment upon release from the level six program. See In re B.S., 616 So.2d 1231 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Rimmer v. State, 601 So.2d 318 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).

STONE, GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur.

A.C. v. State, 837 So. 2d 570, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1405, 2003 WL 289521 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

837 So. 2d 570 (A.C. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related