Rimmer v. State

601 So. 2d 318, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8496, 1992 WL 171376
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 24, 1992·No. No. 92-182·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s judgment and sentence. However, we modify that portion of the judgment and sentence which requires appellant to begin paying restitution at the rate of $100 per month within 60 days of his release from prison. That requirement is modified to provide that appellant shall make every reasonable effort to secure employment immediately upon his release, and that he shall begin paying restitution at the above rate upon securing employment.

AFFIRMED as modified.

DAUKSCH, PETERSON and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rimmer v. State, 601 So. 2d 318, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8496, 1992 WL 171376 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

601 So. 2d 318 (Rimmer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

A.C. v. State
837 So. 2d 570 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
In the Interest of B.S.
616 So. 2d 1231 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)