Rimmer v. State

601 So. 2d 318, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8496, 1992 WL 171376
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 24, 1992
DocketNo. 92-182
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 601 So. 2d 318 (Rimmer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rimmer v. State, 601 So. 2d 318, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8496, 1992 WL 171376 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s judgment and sentence. However, we modify that portion of the judgment and sentence which requires appellant to begin paying restitution at the rate of $100 per month within 60 days of his release from prison. That requirement is modified to provide that appellant shall make every reasonable effort to secure employment immediately upon his release, and that he shall begin paying restitution at the above rate upon securing employment.

AFFIRMED as modified.

DAUKSCH, PETERSON and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

A.C. v. State
837 So. 2d 570 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
In the Interest of B.S.
616 So. 2d 1231 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
601 So. 2d 318, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8496, 1992 WL 171376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rimmer-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.