A.C. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

A.C. v. State

820 So. 2d 1079, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9992, 2002 WL 1558524

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 17, 2002

DocketNo. 2D00-4870

StatusPublished

This text of 820 So. 2d 1079 (A.C. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

A.C. v. State, 820 So. 2d 1079, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9992, 2002 WL 1558524 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

SALCINES, Judge.

A.C. appeals the order of the juvenile division of the circuit court which adjudicated him delinquent for trespass on property other than a structure or conveyance and for obstructing or opposing an officer without violence. We note that this court previously issued the opinion in A.E.B. v. State, 818 So.2d 534 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), relating to A.C.’s codefendant. A.C. has raised the same arguments in his appeal as did the codefendant. We reach the same conclusion as the panel who earlier reviewed the merits of A.E.B.’s appeal. Accordingly, we reverse the adjudication for trespass on property other than a structure or conveyance and affirm the adjudication and commitment for obstructing or opposing an officer without violence.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

NORTHCUTT and KELLY, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SALCINES, Judge.

A.C. appeals the order of the juvenile division of the circuit court which adjudicated him delinquent for trespass on property other than a structure or conveyance and for obstructing or opposing an officer without violence. We note that this court previously issued the opinion in A.E.B. v. State, 818 So.2d 534 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), relating to A.C.’s codefendant. A.C. has raised the same arguments in his appeal as did the codefendant. We reach the same conclusion as the panel who earlier reviewed the merits of A.E.B.’s appeal. Accordingly, we reverse the adjudication for trespass on property other than a structure or conveyance and affirm the adjudication and commitment for obstructing or opposing an officer without violence.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

NORTHCUTT and KELLY, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

820 So. 2d 1079, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9992, 2002 WL 1558524, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ac-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack