A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United States
29 Cust. Ct. 416, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1648
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 32 Cust. Ct. 41 →
United States Customs Court·Decided December 9, 1952·No. No. 56968; protests 172384-K and 173076-K (Ogdensburg)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cellophane sheets similar in all material respects to those the subject of Coughlin Mfg. Co. v. United States (27 Cust. Ct. 40, C. D. 1345) and Gillette Safety Razor Co. v. United States (27 Cust. Ct. 44, C. D. 1346), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. Protest 172384-K having been abandoned as to entry A-1149 was dismissed insofar as it relates to said entry.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United States, 29 Cust. Ct. 416, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1648 (cusc 1952).
29 Cust. Ct. 416 (A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Coughlin Mfg. Co. v. United States
27 Cust. Ct. 40 (U.S. Customs Court, 1951)
Gillette Safety Razor Co. v. United States
27 Cust. Ct. 44 (U.S. Customs Court, 1951)