A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United States

26 Cust. Ct. 366, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 259

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 32 Cust. Ct. 41 →

United States Customs Court·Decided February 28, 1951·No. No. 55267; protests 149677-K, etc. (St. Albans, Vt.)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Cline, J.

At the trial Government counsel conceded that the issue is the same as that involved in United States v. Myers & Co. (11 Ct. Cust. Appls. 409, T. D. 39322). On the record presented it was held that 10 percent of the total weight of the imported merchandise is dutiable at 5 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1530 (a), as modified by the trade agreement with Paraguay (T. D. 51649), and that the balance thereof is dutiable at 3 cents per pound under paragraph 701.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Cline, J.

At the trial Government counsel conceded that the issue is the same as that involved in United States v. Myers & Co. (11 Ct. Cust. Appls. 409, T. D. 39322). On the record presented it was held that 10 percent of the total weight of the imported merchandise is dutiable at 5 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1530 (a), as modified by the trade agreement with Paraguay (T. D. 51649), and that the balance thereof is dutiable at 3 cents per pound under paragraph 701.

A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United States, 26 Cust. Ct. 366, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 259 (cusc 1951).

Pincite

26 Cust. Ct. 366 (A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related