FEDERAL · 9 U.S.C. · Chapter 4
No validity or enforceability
9 U.S.C. § 402
Title9 — Arbitration
Chapter4 — ARBITRATION OF DISPUTES INVOLVING SEXUAL ASSAULT AND SEXUAL HARASSMENT
This text of 9 U.S.C. § 402 (No validity or enforceability) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
9 U.S.C. § 402.
Text
(a)In General.—Notwithstanding any other provision of this title, at the election of the person alleging conduct constituting a sexual harassment dispute or sexual assault dispute, or the named representative of a class or in a collective action alleging such conduct, no predispute arbitration agreement or predispute joint-action waiver shall be valid or enforceable with respect to a case which is filed under Federal, Tribal, or State law and relates to the sexual assault dispute or the sexual harassment dispute.
(b)Determination of Applicability.—An issue as to whether this chapter applies with respect to a dispute shall be determined under Federal law. The applicability of this chapter to an agreement to arbitrate and the validity and enforceability of an agreement to which this chapte
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Zeng v. Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP
(S.D. New York, 2024)
Tyrell Spriggs v. Gardenview Opco LLC
(New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2024)
DELGADO v. APPLE GEORGIA LLC
(M.D. Georgia, 2024)
Joel Soileau v. Space Exploration Technologies Corp.
(C.D. California, 2024)
Smith v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals
(D. Connecticut, 2025)
Melissa Work v. JP Morgan Chase Bank
(D. Oregon, 2025)
Arianna Marino v. Aven Financial, Inc.
(S.D. California, 2025)
Angelia Twedell v. Senior Living Management Group, LLC d/b/a Birch Pointe Health and Rehabilitation
(W.D. Missouri, 2025)
Murrey v. Superior Court
(California Court of Appeal, 2023)
Jessica Fay Einkorn v. UMortgage
(E.D. Pennsylvania, 2025)
Shelley v. Barrett Business Services, Inc.
(Superior Court of Delaware, 2023)
Ramirez v. Law Offices of Adam Zolonz CA2/4
(California Court of Appeal, 2025)
Rita Maria Farnham, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Miranda Corsette v. Grindr, LLC
(M.D. Florida, 2025)
Joseph Talley v. ECPI University, Karen Burgess, Carolyn Galloway Miller, Drew McCabe, Ursula Singleton, Ryan Williams, Patty Bailey
(D. South Carolina, 2025)
Dopak v. Space Exploration Technologies Corporation CA2/4
(California Court of Appeal, 2025)
McNeal v. Exeter Finance LLC (MAG+)
(M.D. Alabama, 2024)
Rossman v. Applied Materials, Inc.
(W.D. Texas, 2024)
Monica J. MacKay v. Disrupt Idea Company, LLC
(Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 2025)
Ramirez v. Domino's Pizza Supply Chain
(D. Colorado, 2025)
Ding, Ph.D. v. Structure Therapeutics, Inc.
(N.D. California, 2025)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 117–90, §2(a), Mar. 3, 2022, 136 Stat. 27.)
Editorial Notes
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date
Section applicable with respect to any dispute or claim that arises or accrues on or after Mar. 3, 2022, see section 3 of Pub. L. 117–90, set out as a note under section 401 of this title.
Effective Date
Section applicable with respect to any dispute or claim that arises or accrues on or after Mar. 3, 2022, see section 3 of Pub. L. 117–90, set out as a note under section 401 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
9 U.S.C. § 402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/9/402.