FEDERAL · 9 U.S.C. · Chapter 4
Definitions
9 U.S.C. § 401
Title9 — Arbitration
Chapter4 — ARBITRATION OF DISPUTES INVOLVING SEXUAL ASSAULT AND SEXUAL HARASSMENT
This text of 9 U.S.C. § 401 (Definitions) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
9 U.S.C. § 401.
Text
In this chapter:
(1)Predispute arbitration agreement.—The term "predispute arbitration agreement" means any agreement to arbitrate a dispute that had not yet arisen at the time of the making of the agreement.
(2)Predispute joint-action waiver.—The term "predispute joint-action waiver" means an agreement, whether or not part of a predispute arbitration agreement, that would prohibit, or waive the right of, one of the parties to the agreement to participate in a joint, class, or collective action in a judicial, arbitral, administrative, or other forum, concerning a dispute that has not yet arisen at the time of the making of the agreement.
(3)Sexual assault dispute.—The term "sexual assault dispute" means a dispute involving a nonconsensual sexual act or sexual contact, as such terms are
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
O'Sullivan v. Jacaranda Club, LLC
2024 NY Slip Op 01117 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
Tyrell Spriggs v. Gardenview Opco LLC
(New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2024)
DELGADO v. APPLE GEORGIA LLC
(M.D. Georgia, 2024)
Smith v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals
(D. Connecticut, 2025)
Angelia Twedell v. Senior Living Management Group, LLC d/b/a Birch Pointe Health and Rehabilitation
(W.D. Missouri, 2025)
Murrey v. Superior Court
(California Court of Appeal, 2023)
Tam v. KMS Automotive CA2/5
(California Court of Appeal, 2023)
Barraza v. Tesla CA1/1
(California Court of Appeal, 2023)
Jessica Fay Einkorn v. UMortgage
(E.D. Pennsylvania, 2025)
Ramirez v. Law Offices of Adam Zolonz CA2/4
(California Court of Appeal, 2025)
Joseph Talley v. ECPI University, Karen Burgess, Carolyn Galloway Miller, Drew McCabe, Ursula Singleton, Ryan Williams, Patty Bailey
(D. South Carolina, 2025)
Dopak v. Space Exploration Technologies Corporation CA2/4
(California Court of Appeal, 2025)
Ding, Ph.D. v. Structure Therapeutics, Inc.
(N.D. California, 2025)
Pablo Espin v. Citibank, N.A.
(Fourth Circuit, 2025)
Cardenas v. F.D. Thomas, Inc.
(E.D. California, 2025)
Martinez v. Midway Venture CA4/1
(California Court of Appeal, 2025)
Judson Motors Ltd D/B/A Universal Toyota v. Jane Doe
(Court of Appeals of Texas, 2025)
Kristian Parks v. Nordson Medical of NH Inc., et al.
(E.D. Tennessee, 2025)
Padock v. Dollar Tree Stores CA4/3
(California Court of Appeal, 2025)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 117–90, §2(a), Mar. 3, 2022, 136 Stat. 26.)
Editorial Notes
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date
Pub. L. 117–90, §3, Mar. 3, 2022, 136 Stat. 28, provided that: "This Act [see Short Title of 2022 Amendment note set out under section 1 of this title], and the amendments made by this Act, shall apply with respect to any dispute or claim that arises or accrues on or after the date of enactment of this Act [Mar. 3, 2022]."
Effective Date
Pub. L. 117–90, §3, Mar. 3, 2022, 136 Stat. 28, provided that: "This Act [see Short Title of 2022 Amendment note set out under section 1 of this title], and the amendments made by this Act, shall apply with respect to any dispute or claim that arises or accrues on or after the date of enactment of this Act [Mar. 3, 2022]."
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
9 U.S.C. § 401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/9/401.