FEDERAL · 8 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER II—IMMIGRATION
Communication between government agencies and the Immigration and Naturalization Service
8 U.S.C. § 1373
This text of 8 U.S.C. § 1373 (Communication between government agencies and the Immigration and Naturalization Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
8 U.S.C. § 1373.
Text
(a)In general
Notwithstanding any other provision of Federal, State, or local law, a Federal, State, or local government entity or official may not prohibit, or in any way restrict, any government entity or official from sending to, or receiving from, the Immigration and Naturalization Service information regarding the citizenship or immigration status, lawful or unlawful, of any individual.
(b)Additional authority of government entities
Notwithstanding any other provision of Federal, State, or local law, no person or agency may prohibit, or in any way restrict, a Federal, State, or local government entity from doing any of the following with respect to information regarding the immigration status, lawful or unlawful, of any individual:
(1)Sending such information to, or requesting or r
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Arizona v. United States
132 S. Ct. 2492 (Supreme Court, 2012)
Chamber of Commerce of United States of America v. Whiting
131 S. Ct. 1968 (Supreme Court, 2011)
United States v. State of Alabama
691 F.3d 1269 (Eleventh Circuit, 2012)
Fred Keller, Jr. v. City of Fremont
719 F.3d 931 (Eighth Circuit, 2013)
City of Chi. v. Sessions
321 F. Supp. 3d 855 (E.D. Illinois, 2018)
Hispanic Interest Coalition of Alabama v. Governor of Alabama
691 F.3d 1236 (Eleventh Circuit, 2012)
Montana Immigrant Justice Alliance v. Bullock
2016 MT 104 (Montana Supreme Court, 2016)
Kearns v. Cuomo
981 F.3d 200 (Second Circuit, 2020)
Fish v. Kobach
259 F. Supp. 3d 1218 (D. Kansas, 2017)
Junior v. LaCroix
263 So. 3d 159 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Daniel Junior, Etc. v. James Lacroix
(District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
City of Evanston v. William P. Barr
(N.D. Illinois, 2019)
The City of Chicago v. William P. Barr
(N.D. Illinois, 2019)
City of Chicago v. William P. Barr
(Seventh Circuit, 2020)
State of Oregon v. Trump
(D. Oregon, 2019)
Kearns v. Cuomo
(W.D. New York, 2019)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 104–208, div. C, title VI, §642, Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–707.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Codification
Section was enacted as part of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, and also as part of the Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act, 1997, and not as part of the Immigration and Nationality Act which comprises this chapter.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Abolition of Immigration and Naturalization Service and Transfer of Functions
For abolition of Immigration and Naturalization Service, transfer of functions, and treatment of related references, see note set out under section 1551 of this title.
Codification
Section was enacted as part of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, and also as part of the Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act, 1997, and not as part of the Immigration and Nationality Act which comprises this chapter.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Abolition of Immigration and Naturalization Service and Transfer of Functions
For abolition of Immigration and Naturalization Service, transfer of functions, and treatment of related references, see note set out under section 1551 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
8 U.S.C. § 1373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/8/1373.