Home/U.S. Code/Title 7/Ch. SUBCHAPTER IV—OTHER COMMODITIES/§ 7253
FEDERAL · 7 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER IV—OTHER COMMODITIES

Consolidation and reform of Federal milk marketing orders

7 U.S.C. § 7253
Title7 — Agriculture
ChapterSUBCHAPTER IV—OTHER COMMODITIES
PartA

This text of 7 U.S.C. § 7253 (Consolidation and reform of Federal milk marketing orders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
7 U.S.C. § 7253.

Text

(a)Amendment of orders The Secretary shall amend Federal milk marketing orders issued under section 608c of this title to limit the number of Federal milk marketing orders to not less than 10 and not more than 14 orders. Upon the petition and approval of California dairy producers in the manner provided in section 608c of this title, the Secretary shall designate the State of California as a separate Federal milk marketing order. The order covering California shall have the right to reblend and distribute order receipts to recognize quota value. Subsection (b) does not apply to the authority of the Secretary under this subsection. Among the issues the Secretary is authorized to implement as part of the consolidation of Federal milk marketing orders are the following:
(A)The use of utiliz

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Milk Industry Foundation v. Glickman
132 F.3d 1467 (D.C. Circuit, 1998)
19 case citations
Minnesota Milk Producers Ass'n v. Glickman
153 F.3d 632 (Eighth Circuit, 1998)
13 case citations
Minnesota Milk Producers Association, a Non-Profit Minnesota Corporation, Individually, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated Bill Dropik, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Chester Kolstad, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Greg Radermacher, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Arnold Ness, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Fredrick J. Bianchi, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Marlon Restad, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Delbert Mandelko, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated John Fischer, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Lee Johnston, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Leslie Kyllo, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated James Muzzy, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated, Appellees/cross-Appellants v. Dan Glickman, Secretary, United States Department of Agriculture, Appellant/cross-Appellee. Minnesota Milk Producers Association, a Non-Profit Minnesota Corporation, Individually, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated Bill Dropik, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Chester Kolstad, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Greg Radermacher, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Arnold Ness, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Fredrick J. Bianchi, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Marlon Restad, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Delbert Mandelko, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated John Fischer, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Lee Johnston, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Leslie Kyllo, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated James Muzzy, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated v. Southeast Dairy Farmers Association and United Dairymen of Arizona, Minnesota Milk Producers Association, a Non-Profit Minnesota Corporation, Individually, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated Bill Dropik, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Chester Kolstad, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Greg Radermacher, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Arnold Ness, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Fredrick J. Bianchi, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Marlon Restad, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Delbert Mandelko, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated John Fischer, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Lee Johnston, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Leslie Kyllo, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated James Muzzy, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated v. National Farmers Organization ("Nfo"), Minnesota Milk Producers Association, a Non-Profit Minnesota Corporation, Individually, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated Bill Dropik, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Chester Kolstad, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Greg Radermacher, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Arnold Ness, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Fredrick J. Bianchi, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Marlon Restad, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Delbert Mandelko, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated John Fischer, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Lee Johnston, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Leslie Kyllo, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated James Muzzy, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated v. Association of Dairy Cooperatives in the Northeast ("Adcne"), Minnesota Milk Producers Association, a Non-Profit Minnesota Corporation, Individually, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated Bill Dropik, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Chester Kolstad, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Greg Radermacher, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Arnold Ness, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Fredrick J. Bianchi, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Marlon Restad, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Delbert Mandelko, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated John Fischer, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Lee Johnston, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Leslie Kyllo, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated James Muzzy, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated v. Texas Association of Dairymen Dairy Producers of New Mexico Lone Star Milk Producers, L.C. And Premier Milk Producers, Inc., Minnesota Milk Producers Association, a Non-Profit Minnesota Corporation, Individually, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated Bill Dropik, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Chester Kolstad, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Greg Radermacher, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Arnold Ness, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Fredrick J. Bianchi, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Marlon Restad, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Delbert Mandelko, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated John Fischer, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Lee Johnston, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Leslie Kyllo, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated James Muzzy, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated v. National Farmers Organization, Inc. (Nfo) and Association of Dairy Cooperatives in the Northeast, Minnesota Milk Producers Association, a Non-Profit Minnesota Corporation, Individually, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated Bill Dropik, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Chester Kolstad, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Greg Radermacher, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Arnold Ness, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Fredrick J. Bianchi, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Marlon Restad, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Delbert Mandelko, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated John Fischer, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Lee Johnston, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Leslie Kyllo, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated James Muzzy, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated v. Louisiana Department of Agriculture and Forestry Alabama Department of Agriculture and Industries Arkansas Livestock and Poultry Commission Colorado Department of Agriculture Georgia Department of Agriculture Kentucky Department of Agriculture Maine Department of Agriculture, Food and Rural Resources Massachusetts Department of Food and Agriculture Mississippi Department of Agriculture and Commerce New Hampshire Department of Agriculture, Markets and Food New Mexico Department of Agriculture North Carolina Department of Agriculture South Carolina Department of Agriculture State of Vermont and Washington Department of Agriculture
153 F.3d 632 (Eighth Circuit, 1998)
5 case citations
Hershey Foods Corp. v. Department of Agriculture
293 F.3d 520 (D.C. Circuit, 2002)
4 case citations
St. Albans Cooperative Creamery, Inc. v. Glickman
68 F. Supp. 2d 380 (D. Vermont, 1999)
2 case citations
MN Milk Producers v. Dan Glickman
(Eighth Circuit, 1998)

Source Credit

History

(Pub. L. 104–127, title I, §143, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 915; Pub. L. 113–79, title I, §1410(d), Feb. 7, 2014, 128 Stat. 693.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Amendments
2014—Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 113–79 inserted at end "Subsection (b) does not apply to the authority of the Secretary under this subsection."

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Use of Option 1A as Price Structure for Class I Milk Under Consolidated Federal Milk Marketing Orders
Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(8) [§1], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–517, provided that:
"(a) Final Rule Defined.—In this section, the term 'final rule' means the final rule for the consolidation and reform of Federal milk marketing orders that was published in the Federal Register on September 1, 1999 (64 Fed. Reg. 47897–48021), to comply with section 143 of the Federal Agriculture Improvement and Reform Act of 1996 (7 U.S.C. 7253).
"(b) Implementation of Final Rule for Milk Order Reform.—Subject to subsection (c), the final rule shall take effect, and be implemented by the Secretary of Agriculture, on the first day of the first month beginning at least 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [Nov. 29, 1999].
"(c) Use of Option 1A for Pricing Class I Milk.—In lieu of the Class I price differentials specified in the final rule, the Secretary of Agriculture shall price fluid or Class I milk under the Federal milk marketing orders using the Class I price differentials identified as Option 1A 'Location-Specific Differentials Analysis' in the proposed rule published in the Federal Register on January 30, 1998 (63 Fed. Reg. 4802, 4809), except that the Secretary shall include the corrections and modifications to such Class I differentials made by the Secretary through April 2, 1999.
"(d) Effect of Prior Announcement of Minimum Prices.—If the Secretary of Agriculture announces minimum prices for milk under Federal milk marketing orders pursuant to section 1000.50 of title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, before the effective date specified in subsection (b), the minimum prices so announced before that date shall be the only applicable minimum prices under Federal milk marketing orders for the month or months for which the prices have been announced.
"(e) Implementation of Requirement.—The implementation of the final rule, as modified by subsection (c), shall not be subject to any of the following:
"(1) The notice and hearing requirements of section 8c(3) of the Agricultural Adjustment Act (7 U.S.C. 608c(3)), reenacted with amendments by the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, or the notice and comment provisions of section 553 of title 5, United States Code.
"(2) A referendum conducted by the Secretary of Agriculture pursuant to subsections (17) or (19) of section 8c of the Agricultural Adjustment Act (7 U.S.C. 608c), reenacted with amendments by the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937.
"(3) The Statement of Policy of the Secretary of Agriculture effective July 24, 1971 (36 Fed. Reg. 13804), relating to notices of proposed rulemaking and public participation in rulemaking.
"(4) Chapter 35 of title 44, United States Code (commonly known as the Paperwork Reduction Act).
"(5) Any decision, restraining order, or injunction issued by a United States court before the date of the enactment of this Act [Nov. 29, 1999]."

Further Rulemaking To Develop Pricing Methods for Class III and Class IV Milk Under Marketing Orders
Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(8) [§2], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–518, provided that:
"(a) Congressional Finding.—The Class III and Class IV milk pricing formulas included in the final decision for the consolidation and reform of Federal milk marketing orders, as published in the Federal Register on April 2, 1999 (64 Fed. Reg. 16025), do not adequately reflect public comment on the original proposed rule published in the Federal Register on January 30, 1998 (63 Fed. Reg. 4802), and are sufficiently different from the proposed rule and any comments submitted with regard to the proposed rule that further emergency rulemaking is merited.
"(b) Rulemaking Required.—The Secretary of Agriculture shall conduct rulemaking, on the record after an opportunity for an agency hearing, to reconsider the Class III and Class IV milk pricing formulas included in the final rule for the consolidation and reform of Federal milk marketing orders that was published in the Federal Register on September 1, 1999 (64 Fed. Reg. 47897–48021).
"(c) Time Period for Rulemaking.—On December 1, 2000, the Secretary of Agriculture shall publish in the Federal Register a final decision on the Class III and Class IV milk pricing formulas. The resulting formulas shall take effect, and be implemented by the Secretary, on January 1, 2001.
"(d) Effect of Court Order.—The actions authorized by subsections (b) and (c) are intended to ensure the timely publication and implementation of new pricing formulas for Class III and Class IV milk. In the event that the Secretary of Agriculture is enjoined or otherwise restrained by a court order from implementing a final decision within the time period specified in subsection (c), the length of time for which that injunction or other restraining order is effective shall be added to the time limitations specified in subsection (c) thereby extending those time limitations by a period of time equal to the period of time for which the injunction or other restraining order is effective.
"(e) Failure To Timely Complete Rulemaking.—If the Secretary of Agriculture fails to implement new Class III and Class IV milk pricing formulas within the time period required under subsection (c) (plus any additional period provided under subsection (d)), the Secretary may not assess or collect assessments from milk producers or handlers under section 8c of the Agricultural Adjustment Act (7 U.S.C. 608c), reenacted with amendments by the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, for marketing order administration and services provided under such section after the end of that period until the pricing formulas are implemented. The Secretary may not reduce the level of services provided under that section on account of the prohibition against assessments, but shall rather cover the cost of marketing order administration and services through funds available for the Agricultural Marketing Service of the Department.
"(f) Implementation of Requirement.—The implementation of the final decision on new Class III and Class IV milk pricing formulas shall not be subject to congressional review under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code."

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 U.S.C. § 7253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/7/7253.