FEDERAL · 7 U.S.C. · Chapter 56
Congressional findings and declaration of policy
7 U.S.C. § 2301
Title7 — Agriculture
Chapter56 — UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES AFFECTING PRODUCERS OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS
This text of 7 U.S.C. § 2301 (Congressional findings and declaration of policy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
7 U.S.C. § 2301.
Text
Agricultural products are produced in the United States by many individual farmers and ranchers scattered throughout the various States of the Nation. Such products in fresh or processed form move in large part in the channels of interstate and foreign commerce, and such products which do not move in these channels directly burden or affect interstate commerce. The efficient production and marketing of agricultural products by farmers and ranchers is of vital concern to their welfare and to the general economy of the Nation. Because agricultural products are produced by numerous individual farmers, the marketing and bargaining position of individual farmers will be adversely affected unless they are free to join together voluntarily in cooperative organizations as authorized by law. Interf
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Michigan Canners & Freezers Assn., Inc. v. Agricultural Marketing and Bargaining Bd.
467 U.S. 461 (Supreme Court, 1984)
Terry v. Tyson Farms, Inc.
604 F.3d 272 (Sixth Circuit, 2010)
United Wild Rice, Inc. v. Nelson
313 N.W.2d 628 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1982)
National Broiler Marketing Ass'n v. United States
436 U.S. 816 (Supreme Court, 1978)
Larry Leonhardt, Dan Laursen, and Rick Rodriquez, Rodriquez Farms, Inc. v. Western Sugar Company, a Corporation
160 F.3d 631 (Tenth Circuit, 1998)
Cochran v. Veneman
359 F.3d 263 (Third Circuit, 2004)
Continental Grain Co., Inc. v. Beasley
628 So. 2d 319 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1993)
United States v. Associated Milk Producers, Inc.
394 F. Supp. 29 (W.D. Missouri, 1975)
Bayside Enterprises, Inc. v. Maine Agricultural Bargaining Board
513 A.2d 1355 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1986)
Alexander v. National Farmers' Organization
614 F. Supp. 745 (W.D. Missouri, 1985)
Ripplemeyer v. National Grape Co-Op. Ass'n, Inc.
807 F. Supp. 1439 (W.D. Arkansas, 1992)
City of Tulsa v. Tyson Foods, Inc.
258 F. Supp. 2d 1263 (N.D. Oklahoma, 2003)
Baldree v. Cargill, Inc.
758 F. Supp. 704 (M.D. Florida, 1990)
Jackson v. Swift-Eckrich
830 F. Supp. 486 (W.D. Arkansas, 1993)
Butz v. Lawson Milk Co., Division Consolidated Foods Corp.
386 F. Supp. 227 (N.D. Ohio, 1974)
Travis Mims v. Cagle's Inc.
148 F. App'x 762 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)
Newark Gardens, Inc. v. Michigan Potato Industry Commission
847 F.2d 1201 (Sixth Circuit, 1988)
ANN VENEMAN, Secretary, U.S. Department of Agriculture,NATIONAL DAIRY PROMOTION BOARD
359 F.3d 263 (Third Circuit, 2004)
Leonhardt v. Western Sugar Co.
(Tenth Circuit, 1998)
Breaking Free LLC v. JCG Foods of Alabama LLC
(N.D. Alabama, 2021)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 90–288, §2, Apr. 16, 1968, 82 Stat. 93.)
Editorial Notes
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Short Title
Pub. L. 90–288, §1, Apr. 16, 1968, 82 Stat. 93, provided: "That this Act [enacting this chapter] shall be known as the Agricultural Fair Practices Act of 1967."
Short Title
Pub. L. 90–288, §1, Apr. 16, 1968, 82 Stat. 93, provided: "That this Act [enacting this chapter] shall be known as the Agricultural Fair Practices Act of 1967."
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
7 U.S.C. § 2301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/7/2301.