FEDERAL · 7 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER III—STOCKYARDS AND STOCKYARD DEALERS
Prevention of unfair, discriminatory, or deceptive practices
7 U.S.C. § 213
Title7 — Agriculture
ChapterSUBCHAPTER III—STOCKYARDS AND STOCKYARD DEALERS
This text of 7 U.S.C. § 213 (Prevention of unfair, discriminatory, or deceptive practices) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
7 U.S.C. § 213.
Text
(a)It shall be unlawful for any stockyard owner, market agency, or dealer to engage in or use any unfair, unjustly discriminatory, or deceptive practice or device in connection with determining whether persons should be authorized to operate at the stockyards, or with the receiving, marketing, buying, or selling on a commission basis or otherwise, feeding, watering, holding, delivery, shipment, weighing, or handling of livestock.
(b)Whenever complaint is made to the Secretary by any person, or whenever the Secretary has reason to believe, that any stockyard owner, market agency, or dealer is violating the provisions of subsection (a), the Secretary after notice and full hearing may make an order that he shall cease and desist from continuing such violation to the extent that the Secretar
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Butz v. Glover Livestock Commission Co.
411 U.S. 182 (Supreme Court, 1973)
Been v. O.K. Industries, Inc.
495 F.3d 1217 (Tenth Circuit, 2007)
Mattes v. United States
721 F.2d 1125 (Seventh Circuit, 1983)
Spencer Livestock Commission Company Mike Donaldson v. Department of Agriculture
841 F.2d 1451 (Ninth Circuit, 1988)
Washington Gas Light Co. v. Public Service Commission
982 A.2d 691 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2009)
Jacob F. Bosma D/B/A Chino Livestock Commission Company and Yardage v. United States Department of Agriculture
754 F.2d 804 (Ninth Circuit, 1985)
Dale Van Wyk and Van's Livestock, Inc. v. Robert Bergland, Secretary of Agriculture
570 F.2d 701 (Eighth Circuit, 1978)
United States v. Joey Haun
124 F.3d 745 (Sixth Circuit, 1997)
Blackfoot Livestock Commission, Co. v. Department of Agriculture, Packers and Stockyards Administration
810 F.2d 916 (Ninth Circuit, 1987)
United States v. Marvin D. Lehman
887 F.2d 1328 (Seventh Circuit, 1989)
Jeffrey C. Ferguson v. United States Department of Agriculture
911 F.2d 1273 (Eighth Circuit, 1990)
Excel Corp. v. United States Department of Agriculture
397 F.3d 1285 (Tenth Circuit, 2005)
Richard N. Garver v. United States of America and United States Department of Agriculture
846 F.2d 1029 (Sixth Circuit, 1988)
Major Lewis v. Earl L. Butz, Secretary of Agriculture and the United States of America
512 F.2d 681 (Eighth Circuit, 1975)
Central Coast Meats, Inc., a California Corporation v. United States Department of Agriculture
541 F.2d 1325 (Ninth Circuit, 1976)
Fairbank v. Hardin
429 F.2d 264 (Ninth Circuit, 1970)
Syverson v. United States Department of Agriculture
601 F.3d 793 (Eighth Circuit, 2010)
Schumacher v. Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc.
434 F. Supp. 2d 748 (D. South Dakota, 2006)
Farrow v. United States Department of Agriculture
760 F.2d 211 (Eighth Circuit, 1985)
United States v. Ocala Live Stock Market, Inc.
861 F. Supp. 2d 1328 (M.D. Florida, 2012)
Source Credit
History
(Aug. 15, 1921, ch. 64, title III, §312, 42 Stat. 167; Pub. L. 85–909, §2(5), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1750; Pub. L. 90–446, §1(e), July 31, 1968, 82 Stat. 475; Pub. L. 94–410, §3, Sept. 13, 1976, 90 Stat. 1249.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1976—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 94–410, §3(a), (c), struck out "in commerce" after "or handling" and substituted "livestock" for "live stock".
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 94–410, §3(b), inserted provisions dealing with authority of Secretary to assess a civil penalty for violations and, upon failure to pay, procedure for recovery of such penalty.
1968—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 90–446 inserted "determining whether persons should be authorized to operate at stockyards, or with" after "in connection with".
1958—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 85–909 struck out "at a stockyard" after "in commerce".
Amendments
1976—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 94–410, §3(a), (c), struck out "in commerce" after "or handling" and substituted "livestock" for "live stock".
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 94–410, §3(b), inserted provisions dealing with authority of Secretary to assess a civil penalty for violations and, upon failure to pay, procedure for recovery of such penalty.
1968—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 90–446 inserted "determining whether persons should be authorized to operate at stockyards, or with" after "in connection with".
1958—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 85–909 struck out "at a stockyard" after "in commerce".
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
7 U.S.C. § 213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/7/213.