FEDERAL · 54 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER I—IN GENERAL
Effect of undertaking on historic property
54 U.S.C. § 306108
Title54 — National Park Service and Related Programs
ChapterSUBCHAPTER I—IN GENERAL
This text of 54 U.S.C. § 306108 (Effect of undertaking on historic property) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
54 U.S.C. § 306108.
Text
The head of any Federal agency having direct or indirect jurisdiction over a proposed Federal or federally assisted undertaking in any State and the head of any Federal department or independent agency having authority to license any undertaking, prior to the approval of the expenditure of any Federal funds on the undertaking or prior to the issuance of any license, shall take into account the effect of the undertaking on any historic property. The head of the Federal agency shall afford the Council a reasonable opportunity to comment with regard to the undertaking.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ctr for Biological Diversity v. Ashton Carter
868 F.3d 803 (Ninth Circuit, 2017)
Narragansett Indian Tribal Historic Preservation Office v. FERC
949 F.3d 8 (D.C. Circuit, 2020)
Martin County, Florida v. Department of Transportation
201 F. Supp. 3d 1 (District of Columbia, 2016)
Nat'l Parks Conservation Ass'n v. Semonite
916 F.3d 1075 (D.C. Circuit, 2019)
Coalition of Concerned Citizens to Make Art Smart v. Federal Transit Administration of U.S. Department of Transportation
843 F.3d 886 (Tenth Circuit, 2016)
Stop B2H Coalition v. Dept. of Energy
525 P.3d 864 (Oregon Supreme Court, 2023)
Oglala Sioux Tribe v. NRC
45 F.4th 291 (D.C. Circuit, 2022)
Narragansett Indian Tribe v. RI Dep't of Transportation
903 F.3d 26 (First Circuit, 2018)
Protect Our Parks, Inc. v. Pete Buttigieg
97 F.4th 1077 (Seventh Circuit, 2024)
Havasupai Tribe v. Heather Provencio
876 F.3d 1242 (Ninth Circuit, 2017)
Landmarks Illinois v. Rock Island County Board
2020 IL App (3d) 190159 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 2020)
Historic Bridge Foundation v. Buttigieg
22 F.4th 275 (First Circuit, 2022)
Tohono O'Odham Nation v. United States Department of the Interior
138 F.4th 1189 (Ninth Circuit, 2025)
City of Scottsdale, Arizona v. FAA
37 F.4th 678 (D.C. Circuit, 2022)
American Whitewater v. FERC
125 F.4th 1139 (D.C. Circuit, 2025)
Narragansett Indian Tribe v. Pollack
(District of Columbia, 2023)
Hippely v. United States
(Federal Claims, 2022)
Sierra Club v. Del Puerto Water District CA5
(California Court of Appeal, 2025)
Lopez v. U.S. Department of the Interior
(S.D. New York, 2023)
PARKER v. FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
(S.D. Indiana, 2022)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3227.)
Editorial Notes
The words "historic property" are substituted for "district, site, building, structure, or object that is included in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register" because of the definition of "historic property" in section 300308 of the new title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
54 U.S.C. § 306108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/54/306108.