FEDERAL · 5 U.S.C. · Chapter 9
Omitted
Current through Pub. L. 119-102
Omitted
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
5 U.S.C. § 913 (Omitted) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gary A. Soucie v. Edward E. David, Jr., Director, Office of Science and Technology
448 F.2d 1067 (D.C. Circuit, 1971)
Amell v. United States
384 U.S. 158 (Supreme Court, 1966)
Panama Canal Company v. Spencer M. Anderson, and Arthur Morgan
312 F.2d 98 (Fifth Circuit, 1963)
Abbott v. United States
151 F. Supp. 929 (Court of Claims, 1957)
Boyd v. Panama Canal Co.
160 F. Supp. 50 (District Court, Canal Zone, 1958)
Biggs v. United States
152 Ct. Cl. 545 (Court of Claims, 1961)
Hubert M. Biggs v. United States
287 F.2d 908 (Court of Claims, 1961)
Abramson v. United States
40 Fed. Cl. 204 (Federal Claims, 1998)
Anderson v. Panama Canal Co.
194 F. Supp. 765 (District Court, Canal Zone, 1961)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Codification
Section, Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 398, providing for decision without debate with respect to motions to postpone, motions to proceed to the consideration of other business, and appeals from decisions of the Chair relating to the application of the rules of the Senate or the House of Representatives, was omitted in the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 95–17, §2, Apr. 6, 1977, 91 Stat. 29. See section 912 of this title.
Codification
Section, Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 398, providing for decision without debate with respect to motions to postpone, motions to proceed to the consideration of other business, and appeals from decisions of the Chair relating to the application of the rules of the Senate or the House of Representatives, was omitted in the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 95–17, §2, Apr. 6, 1977, 91 Stat. 29. See section 912 of this title.