FEDERAL · 5 U.S.C. · Chapter 9
Effective date and publication of reorganization plans
5 U.S.C. § 906
Title5 — Government Organization and Employees
Chapter9 — EXECUTIVE REORGANIZATION
This text of 5 U.S.C. § 906 (Effective date and publication of reorganization plans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
5 U.S.C. § 906.
Text
(a)Except as provided under subsection (c) of this section, a reorganization plan shall be effective upon approval by the President of a resolution (as defined in section 909) with respect to such plan, if such resolution is passed by the House of Representatives and the Senate, within the first period of 90 calendar days of continuous session of Congress after the date on which the plan is transmitted to Congress. Failure of either House to act upon such resolution by the end of such period shall be the same as disapproval of the resolution.
(b)For the purpose of this chapter—
(1)continuity of session is broken only by an adjournment of Congress sine die; and
(2)the days on which either House is not in session because of an adjournment of more than three days to a day certain are excl
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Chadha
462 U.S. 919 (Supreme Court, 1983)
Gary A. Soucie v. Edward E. David, Jr., Director, Office of Science and Technology
448 F.2d 1067 (D.C. Circuit, 1971)
Canning v. National Labor Relations Board
705 F.3d 490 (D.C. Circuit, 2013)
In re Plan for the Abolition of the Council on Affordable Housing
70 A.3d 559 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2013)
American Federation of Government Employees, Afl-Cio v. Samuel R. Pierce, Secretary of Department of Housing and Urban Development
697 F.2d 303 (D.C. Circuit, 1982)
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Cross v. The Hernando Bank, Inc., Cross
724 F.2d 1188 (Fifth Circuit, 1984)
Local 2677, American Federation of Government Employees v. Phillips
358 F. Supp. 60 (District of Columbia, 1973)
Muller Optical Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
574 F. Supp. 946 (W.D. Tennessee, 1983)
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CBS, INC., Defendant-Appellant
743 F.2d 969 (Second Circuit, 1984)
United States v. Fresno Unified School District
592 F.2d 1088 (Ninth Circuit, 1979)
United States v. Keith Stanford Irick
497 F.2d 1369 (Fifth Circuit, 1974)
Hagedorn v. Union Carbide Corporation
363 F. Supp. 1061 (N.D. West Virginia, 1973)
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Allstate Insurance Co.
467 U.S. 1232 (Supreme Court, 1984)
United States v. State of New York
82 F.R.D. 2 (N.D. New York, 1978)
EEOC v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell and Co.
589 F. Supp. 534 (E.D. Missouri, 1984)
United States v. New Jersey
473 F. Supp. 1199 (D. New Jersey, 1979)
Plan for Abolition of Council
38 A.3d 620 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2012)
Sioux Valley Empire Electric Association, Inc. v. Butz
367 F. Supp. 686 (D. South Dakota, 1973)
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Chrysler Corp.
595 F. Supp. 344 (E.D. Michigan, 1984)
Consumer Energy Council of America v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
673 F.2d 425 (D.C. Circuit, 1982)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 396; Pub. L. 95–17, §2, Apr. 6, 1977, 91 Stat. 32; Pub. L. 98–614, §3(a), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3192.)
Editorial Notes
Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1984—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 98–614, §3(a)(1), struck out "otherwise" before "provided under subsection (c)", substituted "shall be" for "is" before "effective", and substituted "upon approval by the President of a resolution (as defined in section 909) with respect to such plan, if such resolution is passed by the House of Representatives and the Senate, within the first period of 90 calendar days of continuous session of Congress after the date on which the plan is transmitted to Congress. Failure of either House to act upon such resolution by the end of such period shall be the same as disapproval of the resolution" for "at the end of the first period of sixty calendar days of continuous session of Congress after the date on which the plan is transmitted to it unless, between the date of transmittal and the end of the sixty-day period, either House passes a resolution stating in substance that the House does not favor the reorganization plan."
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 98–614, §3(a)(2), struck out before period at end "or, if both Houses of Congress have defeated a resolution of disapproval, may be effective at a time earlier than the expiration of the sixty-day period required by subsection (a)".
1977—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 95–17 substituted "sixty" for "60" in two places.
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 95–17 substituted in provisions preceding par. (1) "this chapter" for "subsection (a) of this section" and in par. (2) "any period of time in which Congress is in continuous session" for "the 60-day period".
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 95–17 inserted provision that if both Houses of Congress have defeated a resolution of disapproval, the provision of a reorganization plan may be effective at a time earlier than the expiration of the sixty-day period required by subsec. (a).
Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 95–17 reenacted subsec. (d) without change.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Ratification and Affirmation of Prior Reorganization Plans as Law; Actions Taken Pursuant to Such Plans
Pub. L. 98–532, Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2705, provided that:
"Section 1. The Congress hereby ratifies and affirms as law each reorganization plan that has, prior to the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 19, 1984], been implemented pursuant to the provisions of chapter 9 of title 5, United States Code, or any predecessor Federal reorganization statute.
"Sec. 2. Any actions taken prior to the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 19, 1984] pursuant to a reorganization plan that is ratified and affirmed by section 1 shall be considered to have been taken pursuant to a reorganization expressly approved by Act of Congress."
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1984—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 98–614, §3(a)(1), struck out "otherwise" before "provided under subsection (c)", substituted "shall be" for "is" before "effective", and substituted "upon approval by the President of a resolution (as defined in section 909) with respect to such plan, if such resolution is passed by the House of Representatives and the Senate, within the first period of 90 calendar days of continuous session of Congress after the date on which the plan is transmitted to Congress. Failure of either House to act upon such resolution by the end of such period shall be the same as disapproval of the resolution" for "at the end of the first period of sixty calendar days of continuous session of Congress after the date on which the plan is transmitted to it unless, between the date of transmittal and the end of the sixty-day period, either House passes a resolution stating in substance that the House does not favor the reorganization plan."
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 98–614, §3(a)(2), struck out before period at end "or, if both Houses of Congress have defeated a resolution of disapproval, may be effective at a time earlier than the expiration of the sixty-day period required by subsection (a)".
1977—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 95–17 substituted "sixty" for "60" in two places.
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 95–17 substituted in provisions preceding par. (1) "this chapter" for "subsection (a) of this section" and in par. (2) "any period of time in which Congress is in continuous session" for "the 60-day period".
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 95–17 inserted provision that if both Houses of Congress have defeated a resolution of disapproval, the provision of a reorganization plan may be effective at a time earlier than the expiration of the sixty-day period required by subsec. (a).
Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 95–17 reenacted subsec. (d) without change.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Ratification and Affirmation of Prior Reorganization Plans as Law; Actions Taken Pursuant to Such Plans
Pub. L. 98–532, Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2705, provided that:
"Section 1. The Congress hereby ratifies and affirms as law each reorganization plan that has, prior to the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 19, 1984], been implemented pursuant to the provisions of chapter 9 of title 5, United States Code, or any predecessor Federal reorganization statute.
"Sec. 2. Any actions taken prior to the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 19, 1984] pursuant to a reorganization plan that is ratified and affirmed by section 1 shall be considered to have been taken pursuant to a reorganization expressly approved by Act of Congress."
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
5 U.S.C. § 906, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/5/906.