FEDERAL · 5 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL PROVISIONS
Establishment of performance appraisal systems
5 U.S.C. § 4302
Title5 — Government Organization and Employees
ChapterSUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL PROVISIONS
This text of 5 U.S.C. § 4302 (Establishment of performance appraisal systems) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
5 U.S.C. § 4302.
Text
(a)Each agency shall develop one or more performance appraisal systems which—
(1)provide for periodic appraisals of job performance of employees;
(2)encourage employee participation in establishing performance standards; and
(3)use the results of performance appraisals as a basis for training, rewarding, reassigning, promoting, reducing in grade, retaining, and removing employees.
(b)(1) The head of each agency, in consultation with the Director of the Office of Personnel Management and the Special Counsel, shall develop criteria that—
(A)the head of the agency shall use as a critical element for establishing the job requirements of a supervisory employee; and
(B)promote the protection of whistleblowers.
(2)The criteria required under paragraph (1) shall include—
(A)principles for
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Kelly Lee v. Department of Veterans Affairs
2022 MSPB 11 (Merit Systems Protection Board, 2022)
Chenshiang Lin v. Department of the Air Force
2023 MSPB 2 (Merit Systems Protection Board, 2023)
Overseas Education Ass'n v. Federal Labor Relations Authority
824 F.2d 61 (D.C. Circuit, 1987)
Reynaldo Alvara v. Department of Homeland Security
2014 MSPB 77 (Merit Systems Protection Board, 2014)
American Federation of Government Employees, Local 3365 v. Federal Labor Relations Authority
797 F.2d 612 (Eighth Circuit, 1986)
Paula Sutton v. Department of Homeland Security
(Merit Systems Protection Board, 2024)
Kenneth L. McGowan v. Department of Homeland Security
(Merit Systems Protection Board, 2014)
David Schiller v. Department of Defense
(Merit Systems Protection Board, 2015)
Wanda T. Mallory v. Department of Agriculture
(Merit Systems Protection Board, 2015)
Antoinette B. Brady v. Department of the Navy
(Merit Systems Protection Board, 2015)
Deborah M. Chrisawn v. Social Security Administration
(Merit Systems Protection Board, 2015)
Marcia James v. Department of the Air Force
(Merit Systems Protection Board, 2024)
Wanda Oden Meyers v. Department of the Air Force
(Merit Systems Protection Board, 2023)
Johnnetta Punch v. National Aeronautics and Space Admin
(Merit Systems Protection Board, 2016)
Bill Bailey v. Department of the Army
(Merit Systems Protection Board, 2023)
Janice Atkinson v. Department of Veterans Affairs
(Merit Systems Protection Board, 2023)
Elizabeth Barnes v. Department of the Army
(Merit Systems Protection Board, 2023)
Carla Pablos-Vazira v. Social Security Administration
(Merit Systems Protection Board, 2023)
Joseph Geffrard v. Department of the Treasury
(Merit Systems Protection Board, 2023)
Dana Rogers v. Department of Veterans Affairs
(Merit Systems Protection Board, 2023)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 440; Pub. L. 95–454, title II, §203(a), Oct. 13, 1978, 92 Stat. 1132; Pub. L. 102–378, §2(18), Oct. 2, 1992, 106 Stat. 1347; Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [[div. A], title XI, §1104], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–311; Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title X, §1097(d)(1), Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1619.)
Editorial Notes
Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2017—Subsecs. (b) to (d). Pub. L. 115–91 added subsec. (b) and redesignated former subsecs. (b) and (c) as (c) and (d), respectively.
2000—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 106–398 added subsec. (c).
1992—Subsec. (a)(3). Pub. L. 102–378 substituted a period for semicolon at end.
1978—Pub. L. 95–454 substituted "Establishment of performance appraisal systems" for "Performance-rating plans; establishment of" in section catchline and in text substituted provisions relating to the establishment of a performance appraisal system, for provisions relating to the establishment of performance-rating plans.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1978 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 95–454 effective 90 days after Oct. 13, 1978, see section 907 of Pub. L. 95–454, set out as a note under section 1101 of this title.
Annual Report to Congress on Unacceptable Performance in Whistleblower Protection
Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title X, §1097(d)(3), Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1620, provided that:
"(A) Definitions.—In this paragraph, the terms 'agency' and 'whistleblower' have the meanings given the terms in section 4302(b)(3) of title 5, United States Code, as amended by paragraph (1).
"(B) Report.—Each agency shall annually submit to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate, the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform [now Committee on Oversight and Accountability] of the House of Representatives, and each committee of Congress with jurisdiction over the agency a report that details—
"(i) the number of performance appraisals, for the year covered by the report, that determined that an employee of the agency failed to meet the standards for protecting whistleblowers that were established under section 4302(b) of title 5, United States Code, as amended by paragraph (1);
"(ii) the reasons for the determinations described in clause (i); and
"(iii) each performance-based or corrective action taken by the agency in response to a determination under clause (i)."
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2017—Subsecs. (b) to (d). Pub. L. 115–91 added subsec. (b) and redesignated former subsecs. (b) and (c) as (c) and (d), respectively.
2000—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 106–398 added subsec. (c).
1992—Subsec. (a)(3). Pub. L. 102–378 substituted a period for semicolon at end.
1978—Pub. L. 95–454 substituted "Establishment of performance appraisal systems" for "Performance-rating plans; establishment of" in section catchline and in text substituted provisions relating to the establishment of a performance appraisal system, for provisions relating to the establishment of performance-rating plans.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1978 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 95–454 effective 90 days after Oct. 13, 1978, see section 907 of Pub. L. 95–454, set out as a note under section 1101 of this title.
Annual Report to Congress on Unacceptable Performance in Whistleblower Protection
Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title X, §1097(d)(3), Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1620, provided that:
"(A) Definitions.—In this paragraph, the terms 'agency' and 'whistleblower' have the meanings given the terms in section 4302(b)(3) of title 5, United States Code, as amended by paragraph (1).
"(B) Report.—Each agency shall annually submit to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate, the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform [now Committee on Oversight and Accountability] of the House of Representatives, and each committee of Congress with jurisdiction over the agency a report that details—
"(i) the number of performance appraisals, for the year covered by the report, that determined that an employee of the agency failed to meet the standards for protecting whistleblowers that were established under section 4302(b) of title 5, United States Code, as amended by paragraph (1);
"(ii) the reasons for the determinations described in clause (i); and
"(iii) each performance-based or corrective action taken by the agency in response to a determination under clause (i)."
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
5 U.S.C. § 4302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/5/4302.