FEDERAL · 5 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER I—EXAMINATION, CERTIFICATION, AND APPOINTMENT
Preference eligibles; judicial redress
5 U.S.C. § 3330b
Title5 — Government Organization and Employees
ChapterSUBCHAPTER I—EXAMINATION, CERTIFICATION, AND APPOINTMENT
This text of 5 U.S.C. § 3330b (Preference eligibles; judicial redress) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
5 U.S.C. § 3330b.
Text
(a)In lieu of continuing the administrative redress procedure provided under section 3330a(d), a preference eligible, or a veteran described by section 3330a(a)(1)(B) with respect to a violation described by such section, may elect, in accordance with this section, to terminate those administrative proceedings and file an action with the appropriate United States district court not later than 60 days after the date of the election.
(b)An election under this section may not be made—
(1)before the 121st day after the date on which the appeal is filed with the Merit Systems Protection Board under section 3330a(d); or
(2)after the Merit Systems Protection Board has issued a judicially reviewable decision on the merits of the appeal.
(c)An election under this section shall be made, in writ
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Conyers v. Rossides
558 F.3d 137 (Second Circuit, 2009)
Conforto v. Merit Systems Protection Board
713 F.3d 1111 (Federal Circuit, 2013)
Kirkendall v. Department of the Army
479 F.3d 830 (Federal Circuit, 2007)
Lane v. Potter
699 F. Supp. 2d 358 (D. Massachusetts, 2010)
Hunt v. United States Government
154 F. Supp. 2d 1047 (E.D. Michigan, 2001)
John S. Pope v. United States Department of Transportation
421 F.3d 480 (Seventh Circuit, 2005)
Figueroa v. Napolitano
772 F. Supp. 2d 741 (D. South Carolina, 2010)
Pope, John S. v. TRAN
(Seventh Circuit, 2005)
Atanus, Susanne v. Donaldson, William
(Seventh Circuit, 2005)
Marie Conforto v. Mspb
(Federal Circuit, 2013)
Wesley v. Brennan
(E.D. Missouri, 2020)
Conyers v. Hawley
(Second Circuit, 2009)
McIver v. Shulkin
(District of Columbia, 2018)
Lance McDermott v. United States Postal Service
(Merit Systems Protection Board, 2016)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 105–339, §3(a), Oct. 31, 1998, 112 Stat. 3184; amended Pub. L. 108–454, title VIII, §804(b), Dec. 10, 2004, 118 Stat. 3626.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2004—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 108–454, which directed insertion of ", or a veteran described by section 3330a(a)(1)(B) with respect to a violation described by such section," after "a preference eligible" in subsec. (a) of section 3330b, without specifying the Code title to be amended, was executed by making the insertion in subsec. (a) of this section, to reflect the probable intent of Congress.
Amendments
2004—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 108–454, which directed insertion of ", or a veteran described by section 3330a(a)(1)(B) with respect to a violation described by such section," after "a preference eligible" in subsec. (a) of section 3330b, without specifying the Code title to be amended, was executed by making the insertion in subsec. (a) of this section, to reflect the probable intent of Congress.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
5 U.S.C. § 3330b, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/5/3330b.