FEDERAL · 5 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER I—EXAMINATION, CERTIFICATION, AND APPOINTMENT
Selective Service registration
5 U.S.C. § 3328
Title5 — Government Organization and Employees
ChapterSUBCHAPTER I—EXAMINATION, CERTIFICATION, AND APPOINTMENT
This text of 5 U.S.C. § 3328 (Selective Service registration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
5 U.S.C. § 3328.
Text
(a)An individual—
(2)who is not so registered or knowingly and willfully did not so register before the requirement terminated or became inapplicable to the individual,
shall be ineligible for appointment to a position in an Executive agency.
(b)Subsection (a) shall not apply to an individual—
(1)who is a veteran;
(2)who provides evidence of active duty service to the Executive agency in which the individual seeks an appointment; and
(c)The Office of Personnel Management, in
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Elgin v. Department of the Treasury
132 S. Ct. 2126 (Supreme Court, 2012)
Samuel F. Vesser, Jr. v. Office of Personnel Management
29 F.3d 600 (Federal Circuit, 1994)
Bebo v. Securities & Exchange Commission
799 F.3d 765 (Seventh Circuit, 2015)
Elgin v. U.S. Department of the Treasury
641 F.3d 6 (First Circuit, 2011)
Davis v. Billington
51 F. Supp. 3d 97 (District of Columbia, 2014)
Wigton v. Berry
949 F. Supp. 2d 616 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 2013)
Henry v. Secretary of Department of Treasury
266 F. Supp. 3d 80 (District of Columbia, 2017)
Elgin v. United States
697 F. Supp. 2d 187 (D. Massachusetts, 2010)
Nicholls v. United States Office of Personnel Management
863 F. Supp. 2d 4 (District of Columbia, 2012)
Morris & Dickson Co. v. Whitaker
360 F. Supp. 3d 434 (W.D. Louisiana, 2018)
Rakhmatulla Asatov v. Office of Personnel Management
(Merit Systems Protection Board, 2015)
Hudson v. American Federation of Government Employees
(District of Columbia, 2022)
Opinion No.
(Texas Attorney General Reports, 2000)
Special Counsel ex rel. Vincent Cefalu v. Department of Justice
(Merit Systems Protection Board, 2014)
Special Counsel ex rel. Vincent Cefalu v. Department of Justice
(Merit Systems Protection Board, 2014)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 99–145, title XVI, §1622(a)(1), Nov. 8, 1985, 99 Stat. 777; amended Pub. L. 100–180, div. A, title XII, §1249, Dec. 4, 1987, 101 Stat. 1167; Pub. L. 118–159, div. A, title XI, §1108, Dec. 23, 2024, 138 Stat. 2089.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2024—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 118–159, §1108(1), substituted "(50 U.S.C. 3802)" for "(50 U.S.C. App. 453)".
Subsecs. (b), (c). Pub. L. 118–159, §1108(2), (3), added subsec. (b) and redesignated former subsec. (b) as (c).
Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 118–159, §1108(4), added subsec. (d).
1987—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 100–180 struck out "within the Office" after "for the adjudication" in second sentence and inserted at end "Such procedures may provide that determinations of eligibility under the requirements of this section shall be adjudicated by the Executive agency making the appointment for which the eligibility is determined."
Amendments
2024—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 118–159, §1108(1), substituted "(50 U.S.C. 3802)" for "(50 U.S.C. App. 453)".
Subsecs. (b), (c). Pub. L. 118–159, §1108(2), (3), added subsec. (b) and redesignated former subsec. (b) as (c).
Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 118–159, §1108(4), added subsec. (d).
1987—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 100–180 struck out "within the Office" after "for the adjudication" in second sentence and inserted at end "Such procedures may provide that determinations of eligibility under the requirements of this section shall be adjudicated by the Executive agency making the appointment for which the eligibility is determined."
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
5 U.S.C. § 3328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/5/3328.