FEDERAL · 49 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER II—NATIONAL AVIATION NOISE POLICY

Airport noise and access restriction review program

49 U.S.C. § 47524
Title49Transportation
ChapterSUBCHAPTER II—NATIONAL AVIATION NOISE POLICY

This text of 49 U.S.C. § 47524 (Airport noise and access restriction review program) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
49 U.S.C. § 47524.

Text

(a)General Requirements.—The national aviation noise policy established under section 47523 of this title shall provide for establishing by regulation a national program for reviewing airport noise and access restrictions on the operation of stage 2 and stage 3 aircraft. The program shall provide for adequate public notice and opportunity for comment on the restrictions.
(b)Stage 2 Aircraft.—Except as provided in subsection (d) of this section, an airport noise or access restriction may include a restriction on the operation of stage 2 aircraft proposed after October 1, 1990, only if the airport operator publishes the proposed restriction and prepares and makes available for public comment at least 180 days before the effective date of the proposed restriction—
(1)an analysis of the ant

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Friends of the East Hampton Airport, Inc. v. Town of East Hampton
841 F.3d 133 (Second Circuit, 2016)
65 case citations
Coalition for Competitive Electricity, Dynegy Inc. v. Zibelman
272 F. Supp. 3d 554 (S.D. New York, 2017)
9 case citations
Palm Beach County v. Federal Aviation Administration
53 F.4th 1318 (Eleventh Circuit, 2022)
4 case citations
Friends of the East Hampton Airport, Inc. v. Town of East Hampton
152 F. Supp. 3d 90 (E.D. New York, 2015)
3 case citations
National Business Aviation Ass'n v. City of Naples Airport Authority
162 F. Supp. 2d 1343 (M.D. Florida, 2001)
2 case citations
City of Mukilteo v. U.S. Dept. of TransporTation
815 F.3d 632 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
2 case citations
Matter of East End Hangars, Inc. v. Town of E. Hampton, N.Y.
2024 NY Slip Op 01708 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)

Source Credit

History

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1288; Pub. L. 112–95, title I, §111(c)(2)(A)(vii), Feb. 14, 2012, 126 Stat. 18.)

Editorial Notes

In subsection (a), the words "shall provide for establishing" are substituted for "shall require the establishment . . . of" as being more appropriate. The words "in accordance with the provisions of this section" are omitted as surplus.
In subsection (b), the words "proposed after October 1, 1990" are substituted for 49 App.:2153(a)(2)(A) to eliminate unnecessary words.
In subsection (c)(1), before clause (A), the words "not in effect on October 1, 1990" are substituted for 49 App.:2153(a)(2)(B) to eliminate unnecessary words. In clause (B), the words "direct or indirect" are omitted as surplus.
In subsection (c)(2)(A)–(D) and (F), the word "proposed" is omitted as surplus. In clause (D), the word "existing" is omitted as surplus.
In subsection (c)(4), the words "that justifies a reevaluation" are substituted for "and that a review and reevaluation . . . of the previously approved or agreed to noise restriction is therefore justified" to eliminate unnecessary words.
In subsection (d)(6), the words "calendar year" are omitted as surplus.

Editorial Notes

Amendments
2012—Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 112–95 substituted "charge" for "fee" in introductory provisions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 U.S.C. § 47524, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/49/47524.