FEDERAL · 49 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER II—NATIONAL AVIATION NOISE POLICY
Airport noise and access restriction review program
49 U.S.C. § 47524
Title49 — Transportation
ChapterSUBCHAPTER II—NATIONAL AVIATION NOISE POLICY
This text of 49 U.S.C. § 47524 (Airport noise and access restriction review program) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
49 U.S.C. § 47524.
Text
(a)General Requirements.—The national aviation noise policy established under section 47523 of this title shall provide for establishing by regulation a national program for reviewing airport noise and access restrictions on the operation of stage 2 and stage 3 aircraft. The program shall provide for adequate public notice and opportunity for comment on the restrictions.
(b)Stage 2 Aircraft.—Except as provided in subsection (d) of this section, an airport noise or access restriction may include a restriction on the operation of stage 2 aircraft proposed after October 1, 1990, only if the airport operator publishes the proposed restriction and prepares and makes available for public comment at least 180 days before the effective date of the proposed restriction—
(1)an analysis of the ant
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Friends of the East Hampton Airport, Inc. v. Town of East Hampton
841 F.3d 133 (Second Circuit, 2016)
Coalition for Competitive Electricity, Dynegy Inc. v. Zibelman
272 F. Supp. 3d 554 (S.D. New York, 2017)
Palm Beach County v. Federal Aviation Administration
53 F.4th 1318 (Eleventh Circuit, 2022)
Friends of the East Hampton Airport, Inc. v. Town of East Hampton
152 F. Supp. 3d 90 (E.D. New York, 2015)
National Business Aviation Ass'n v. City of Naples Airport Authority
162 F. Supp. 2d 1343 (M.D. Florida, 2001)
City of Mukilteo v. U.S. Dept. of TransporTation
815 F.3d 632 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
Delux Public Charter v. County of Westchester
(Second Circuit, 2025)
Matter of East End Hangars, Inc. v. Town of E. Hampton, N.Y.
2024 NY Slip Op 01708 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
Millard Refrigerated Services, Inc. v. Federal Aviation Administration, Omaha Airport Authority, Intervenor
98 F.3d 1361 (Federal Circuit, 1996)
Helicopter Association International v. State of Hawai'i
(D. Hawaii, 2024)
Delux Public Charter, LLC v. County of Westchester, New York
(S.D. New York, 2024)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1288; Pub. L. 112–95, title I, §111(c)(2)(A)(vii), Feb. 14, 2012, 126 Stat. 18.)
Editorial Notes
In subsection (a), the words "shall provide for establishing" are substituted for "shall require the establishment . . . of" as being more appropriate. The words "in accordance with the provisions of this section" are omitted as surplus.
In subsection (b), the words "proposed after October 1, 1990" are substituted for 49 App.:2153(a)(2)(A) to eliminate unnecessary words.
In subsection (c)(1), before clause (A), the words "not in effect on October 1, 1990" are substituted for 49 App.:2153(a)(2)(B) to eliminate unnecessary words. In clause (B), the words "direct or indirect" are omitted as surplus.
In subsection (c)(2)(A)–(D) and (F), the word "proposed" is omitted as surplus. In clause (D), the word "existing" is omitted as surplus.
In subsection (c)(4), the words "that justifies a reevaluation" are substituted for "and that a review and reevaluation . . . of the previously approved or agreed to noise restriction is therefore justified" to eliminate unnecessary words.
In subsection (d)(6), the words "calendar year" are omitted as surplus.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2012—Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 112–95 substituted "charge" for "fee" in introductory provisions.
In subsection (b), the words "proposed after October 1, 1990" are substituted for 49 App.:2153(a)(2)(A) to eliminate unnecessary words.
In subsection (c)(1), before clause (A), the words "not in effect on October 1, 1990" are substituted for 49 App.:2153(a)(2)(B) to eliminate unnecessary words. In clause (B), the words "direct or indirect" are omitted as surplus.
In subsection (c)(2)(A)–(D) and (F), the word "proposed" is omitted as surplus. In clause (D), the word "existing" is omitted as surplus.
In subsection (c)(4), the words "that justifies a reevaluation" are substituted for "and that a review and reevaluation . . . of the previously approved or agreed to noise restriction is therefore justified" to eliminate unnecessary words.
In subsection (d)(6), the words "calendar year" are omitted as surplus.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2012—Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 112–95 substituted "charge" for "fee" in introductory provisions.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
49 U.S.C. § 47524, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/49/47524.