FEDERAL · 49 U.S.C. · Chapter 447
Amendments, modifications, suspensions, and revocations of certificates
49 U.S.C. § 44709
Title49 — Transportation
Chapter447 — SAFETY REGULATION
This text of 49 U.S.C. § 44709 (Amendments, modifications, suspensions, and revocations of certificates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
49 U.S.C. § 44709.
Text
(a)Reinspection and Reexamination.—
(1)In general.—The Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration may reinspect at any time a civil aircraft, aircraft engine, propeller, appliance, design organization, production certificate holder, air navigation facility, or air agency, or reexamine an airman holding a certificate issued under section 44703 of this title.
(2)Notification of reexamination of airman.—Before taking any action to reexamine an airman under paragraph (1) the Administrator shall provide to the airman—
(A)a reasonable basis, described in detail, for requesting the reexamination; and
(B)any information gathered by the Federal Aviation Administration, that the Administrator determines is appropriate to provide, such as the scope and nature of the requested reexamina
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Gatx/airlog Company Gatx Capital Corporation Airlog Management Corporation Frederick L. Hatton and Sanford P. Burnstein v. United States
286 F.3d 1168 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)
Zephyr Aviation, L.L.C., Zephyr Aviation, L.L.C. v. Robert Alan Dailey, Also Known as Bob Dailey Kenneth Wayne Clary, Also Known as Ken Clary
247 F.3d 565 (Fifth Circuit, 2001)
Frederick John Kratt v. Jane F. Garvey, Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration
342 F.3d 475 (Sixth Circuit, 2003)
Gorman v. National Transportation Safety Board
558 F.3d 580 (D.C. Circuit, 2009)
Newton v. Federal Aviation Administration
457 F.3d 1133 (Tenth Circuit, 2006)
Amy McNaught v. Billy Nolen
76 F.4th 764 (Eighth Circuit, 2023)
Coghlan v. National Transportation Safety Board
470 F.3d 1300 (Eleventh Circuit, 2006)
Singleton v. Babbitt
588 F.3d 1078 (D.C. Circuit, 2009)
Gatx/airlog Company, Gatx Capital Corporation, Airlog Management Corporation, Frederick L. Hattonand Sanford P. Burnstein v. United States
234 F.3d 1089 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)
Moshea v. National Transportation Safety Board
570 F.3d 349 (D.C. Circuit, 2009)
Thunderbird Propellers, Inc. v. Federal Aviation Administration
191 F.3d 1290 (Tenth Circuit, 1999)
Rambus, Inc. v. Infineon Technologies AG
222 F.R.D. 101 (E.D. Virginia, 2004)
Garland v. US Airways Inc.
270 F. App'x 99 (Third Circuit, 2008)
Michael Huerta v. Jody Ducote
792 F.3d 144 (D.C. Circuit, 2015)
Echo, Inc. v. Hinson
48 F.3d 8 (First Circuit, 1995)
Grossman v. Department of Transportation
11 F. App'x 780 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)
Trenton Palmer v. FAA
103 F.4th 798 (D.C. Circuit, 2024)
Leaschauer v. National Transportation Safety Board
667 F. App'x 260 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
Paskar v. USDOT
(Second Circuit, 2013)
Darst v. Federal Aviation Administration
57 F. App'x 530 (Third Circuit, 2003)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1190; Pub. L. 106–181, title VII, §716, Apr. 5, 2000, 114 Stat. 162; Pub. L. 108–176, title II, §227(c), Dec. 12, 2003, 117 Stat. 2532; Pub. L. 112–153, §2(c)(2), Aug. 3, 2012, 126 Stat. 1161; Pub. L. 115–254, div. B, title III, §393(a), Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3325.)
Editorial Notes
In this section, the word "Administrator" in section 609(a) of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (Public Law 85–726, 72 Stat. 779) is retained on authority of 49:106(g). The words "modifying", "modify", and "modified" are omitted as surplus.
In subsection (a), the words "airman holding a certificate issued under section 44703 of this title" are substituted for "civil airman" for clarity.
In subsection (b)(1), before subclause (A), the words "certificate issued under this chapter" are substituted for "type certificate, production certificate, airworthiness certificate, airman certificate, air carrier operating certificate, air navigation facility certificate (including airport operating certificate), or air agency certificate" to eliminate unnecessary words.
In subsection (b)(2), the words "in his discretion" and "regarding the use or operation of an aircraft" in 49 App.:1429(b) are omitted as surplus.
In subsection (c), the words "cases of" in 49 App.:1429(a) are omitted as surplus.
In subsection (d)(1), before clause (A), the word "adversely" is substituted for "whose certificate is" in 49 App.:1429(a), and the words "an opportunity for a" are added, for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the United States Code. The words "of the FAA" in 49 App.:1431(e) are omitted as surplus.
In subsection (d)(2), the words "consistent with this subsection" are omitted as surplus.
In subsection (d)(3), the word "Administrator" is substituted for "Federal Aviation Administration" because of 49:106(b) and (g).
In subsection (e), before clause (1), the words "the effectiveness of" are omitted as surplus.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2018—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 115–254 designated existing provisions as par. (1), inserted heading, and added par. (2).
2012—Subsec. (d)(3). Pub. L. 112–153 struck out "but is bound by all validly adopted interpretations of laws and regulations the Administrator carries out and of written agency policy guidance available to the public related to sanctions to be imposed under this section unless the Board finds an interpretation is arbitrary, capricious, or otherwise not according to law" after "Administrator".
2003—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 108–176 inserted "design organization, production certificate holder," after "appliance,".
2000—Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 106–181 amended heading and text of subsec. (e) generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "When a person files an appeal with the Board under subsection (d) of the section, the order of the Administrator is stayed. However, if the Administrator advises the Board that an emergency exists and safety in air commerce or air transportation requires the order to be effective immediately—
"(1) the order is effective; and
"(2) the Board shall make a final disposition of the appeal not later than 60 days after the Administrator so advises the Board."
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2003 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 108–176 applicable only to fiscal years beginning after Sept. 30, 2003, except as otherwise specifically provided, see section 3 of Pub. L. 108–176, set out as a note under section 106 of this title.
Effective Date of 2000 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 106–181 applicable only to fiscal years beginning after Sept. 30, 1999, see section 3 of Pub. L. 106–181, set out as a note under section 106 of this title.
Risk Model for Production Facility Inspections
Pub. L. 118–63, title III, §314, May 16, 2024, 138 Stat. 1077, provided that:
"(a) In General.—Not later than 12 months after the date of enactment of this Act [May 16, 2024], and periodically thereafter, the Administrator [of the Federal Aviation Administration] shall—
"(1) conduct a review of the risk-based model used by certification management offices of the FAA [Federal Aviation Administration] to inform the frequency of aircraft manufacturing or production facility inspections; and
"(2) update the model to ensure such model adequately accounts for risk at facilities during periods of increased production.
"(b) Briefings.—Not later than 60 days after the date on which the review is completed under subsection (a), the Administrator shall brief the appropriate committees of Congress [Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives] on—
"(1) the results of the review;
"(2) any changes made to the risk-based model described in subsection (a); and
"(3) how such changes would help improve the in-plant inspection process."
In subsection (a), the words "airman holding a certificate issued under section 44703 of this title" are substituted for "civil airman" for clarity.
In subsection (b)(1), before subclause (A), the words "certificate issued under this chapter" are substituted for "type certificate, production certificate, airworthiness certificate, airman certificate, air carrier operating certificate, air navigation facility certificate (including airport operating certificate), or air agency certificate" to eliminate unnecessary words.
In subsection (b)(2), the words "in his discretion" and "regarding the use or operation of an aircraft" in 49 App.:1429(b) are omitted as surplus.
In subsection (c), the words "cases of" in 49 App.:1429(a) are omitted as surplus.
In subsection (d)(1), before clause (A), the word "adversely" is substituted for "whose certificate is" in 49 App.:1429(a), and the words "an opportunity for a" are added, for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the United States Code. The words "of the FAA" in 49 App.:1431(e) are omitted as surplus.
In subsection (d)(2), the words "consistent with this subsection" are omitted as surplus.
In subsection (d)(3), the word "Administrator" is substituted for "Federal Aviation Administration" because of 49:106(b) and (g).
In subsection (e), before clause (1), the words "the effectiveness of" are omitted as surplus.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2018—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 115–254 designated existing provisions as par. (1), inserted heading, and added par. (2).
2012—Subsec. (d)(3). Pub. L. 112–153 struck out "but is bound by all validly adopted interpretations of laws and regulations the Administrator carries out and of written agency policy guidance available to the public related to sanctions to be imposed under this section unless the Board finds an interpretation is arbitrary, capricious, or otherwise not according to law" after "Administrator".
2003—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 108–176 inserted "design organization, production certificate holder," after "appliance,".
2000—Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 106–181 amended heading and text of subsec. (e) generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "When a person files an appeal with the Board under subsection (d) of the section, the order of the Administrator is stayed. However, if the Administrator advises the Board that an emergency exists and safety in air commerce or air transportation requires the order to be effective immediately—
"(1) the order is effective; and
"(2) the Board shall make a final disposition of the appeal not later than 60 days after the Administrator so advises the Board."
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2003 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 108–176 applicable only to fiscal years beginning after Sept. 30, 2003, except as otherwise specifically provided, see section 3 of Pub. L. 108–176, set out as a note under section 106 of this title.
Effective Date of 2000 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 106–181 applicable only to fiscal years beginning after Sept. 30, 1999, see section 3 of Pub. L. 106–181, set out as a note under section 106 of this title.
Risk Model for Production Facility Inspections
Pub. L. 118–63, title III, §314, May 16, 2024, 138 Stat. 1077, provided that:
"(a) In General.—Not later than 12 months after the date of enactment of this Act [May 16, 2024], and periodically thereafter, the Administrator [of the Federal Aviation Administration] shall—
"(1) conduct a review of the risk-based model used by certification management offices of the FAA [Federal Aviation Administration] to inform the frequency of aircraft manufacturing or production facility inspections; and
"(2) update the model to ensure such model adequately accounts for risk at facilities during periods of increased production.
"(b) Briefings.—Not later than 60 days after the date on which the review is completed under subsection (a), the Administrator shall brief the appropriate committees of Congress [Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives] on—
"(1) the results of the review;
"(2) any changes made to the risk-based model described in subsection (a); and
"(3) how such changes would help improve the in-plant inspection process."
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
49 U.S.C. § 44709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/49/44709.