FEDERAL · 49 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL

Relationship to other laws

49 U.S.C. § 30103
Title49Transportation
ChapterSUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL

This text of 49 U.S.C. § 30103 (Relationship to other laws) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
49 U.S.C. § 30103.

Text

(a)Uniformity of Regulations.—The Secretary of Transportation may not prescribe a safety regulation related to a motor vehicle subject to subchapter I of chapter 135 of this title that differs from a motor vehicle safety standard prescribed under this chapter. However, the Secretary may prescribe, for a motor vehicle operated by a carrier subject to subchapter I of chapter 135, a safety regulation that imposes a higher standard of performance after manufacture than that required by an applicable standard in effect at the time of manufacture.
(b)Preemption.—
(1)When a motor vehicle safety standard is in effect under this chapter, a State or a political subdivision of a State may prescribe or continue in effect a standard applicable to the same aspect of performance of a motor vehicle or m

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Geier v. American Honda Motor Co.
529 U.S. 861 (Supreme Court, 2000)
896 case citations
PLIVA, Inc. v. Mensing
180 L. Ed. 2d 580 (Supreme Court, 2011)
420 case citations
MCI Sales and Service, Inc. v. Hinton
329 S.W.3d 475 (Texas Supreme Court, 2010)
141 case citations
Vickie Thorne v. Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack
980 F.3d 879 (Third Circuit, 2020)
75 case citations
Beverly M. Fisher and John B. Fisher, Sr. v. Ford Motor Company
224 F.3d 570 (Sixth Circuit, 2000)
51 case citations
O'Hara Ex Rel. H.O. v. General Motors Corp.
508 F.3d 753 (Fifth Circuit, 2007)
36 case citations
Hyundai Motor Co. v. Alvarado
974 S.W.2d 1 (Texas Supreme Court, 1998)
35 case citations
In Re Air Bag Products Liability Litigation
7 F. Supp. 2d 792 (E.D. Louisiana, 1998)
34 case citations
Malcolm v. EVENFLO CO., INC.
2009 MT 285 (Montana Supreme Court, 2009)
32 case citations
MCI Sales and Service, Inc. v. Hinton
272 S.W.3d 17 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2008)
28 case citations
Morgan v. Ford Motor Co.
680 S.E.2d 77 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 2009)
20 case citations
Hernandez-Gomez v. Leonardo
884 P.2d 183 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1994)
17 case citations
Cellucci v. General Motors Corp.
676 A.2d 253 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1996)
16 case citations
Fisher v. Ford Motor Co.
13 F. Supp. 2d 631 (N.D. Ohio, 1998)
12 case citations
Attocknie v. Carpenter Manufacturing, Inc.
901 P.2d 221 (Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, 1995)
10 case citations
Priester v. Cromer
736 S.E.2d 249 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2012)
9 case citations
Paris Limousine of Oklahoma, LLC v. Executive Coach Builders, Inc.
867 F.3d 871 (Eighth Circuit, 2017)
7 case citations
Martin v. Ford Motor Co.
292 F.R.D. 252 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2013)
6 case citations

Source Credit

History

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 943; Pub. L. 104–88, title III, §308(j), Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 947.)

Editorial Notes

In subsection (a), the words "or the Transportation of Explosives Act, as amended (18 U.S.C. 831–835)" are omitted as obsolete because 18:831–835 have been repealed. The word "prescribe" is substituted for "adopt" for consistency. The words "or continue in effect" and "In prescribing safety regulations" are omitted as surplus. The word "prescribed" is substituted for "issued" for consistency. The words "to comply" and "Federal" are omitted as surplus. The words "in effect" are added for clarity.
In subsection (b)(1), the word "Federal" is omitted as surplus. The word "prescribe" is substituted for "either to establish, or to continue in effect" for consistency and to eliminate unnecessary words. The words "standard prescribed under this chapter" are substituted for "Federal standard" for clarity. The words "However, the United States . . . may prescribe" are substituted for "Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent the Federal . . . from establishing" for consistency. The words "of a State" are substituted for "thereof" for clarity. The word "standard" is substituted for "safety requirement" for consistency. The words "performance requirement" are substituted for "standard of performance" to avoid using "standard" in 2 different ways.
Subsection (b)(2) is substituted for 15:1392(d) (2d sentence) for consistency and to eliminate unnecessary words.
In subsection (c), the words "be deemed to" and "of the United States" are omitted as surplus.
In subsection (d), the words "United States" are substituted for "Federal" in 15:1420 for consistency. The words "Consumer" in 15:1420, "not in lieu of" in 15:1410a(e) and 1420, and "not in substitution for" in 15:1394(a)(6) are omitted as surplus. The word "other" is added for clarity.

Editorial Notes

Amendments
1995—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 104–88 substituted "subchapter I of chapter 135" for "subchapter II of chapter 105" in two places.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 1995 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 104–88 effective Jan. 1, 1996, see section 2 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as an Effective Date note under section 1301 of this title.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 U.S.C. § 30103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/49/30103.