FEDERAL · 49 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER IV—ENFORCEMENT AND ADMINISTRATIVE

Judicial review of standards

49 U.S.C. § 30161
Title49Transportation
ChapterSUBCHAPTER IV—ENFORCEMENT AND ADMINISTRATIVE

This text of 49 U.S.C. § 30161 (Judicial review of standards) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
49 U.S.C. § 30161.

Text

(a)Filing and Venue.—A person adversely affected by an order prescribing a motor vehicle safety standard under this chapter may apply for review of the order by filing a petition for review in the court of appeals of the United States for the circuit in which the person resides or has its principal place of business. The petition must be filed not later than 59 days after the order is issued.
(b)Notifying Secretary.—The clerk of the court shall send immediately a copy of the petition to the Secretary of Transportation. The Secretary shall file with the court a record of the proceeding in which the order was prescribed.
(c)Additional Proceedings.—
(1)On request of the petitioner, the court may order the Secretary to receive additional evidence and evidence in rebuttal if the court is sat

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Delta Construction Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency
783 F.3d 1291 (D.C. Circuit, 2015)
27 case citations
California Energy Commission v. Department of Energy
585 F.3d 1143 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)
11 case citations
Public Citizen Inc. v. Mineta
343 F.3d 1159 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)
9 case citations
Washington v. Department of Transportation
84 F.3d 1222 (Tenth Circuit, 1996)
5 case citations
Air Brake Systems, Inc. v. Mineta
202 F. Supp. 2d 705 (E.D. Michigan, 2002)
3 case citations
CONTINI BY CONTINI v. Hyundai Motor Co.
876 F. Supp. 540 (S.D. New York, 1995)
2 case citations
United States v. Chrysler Corp.
995 F. Supp. 150 (District of Columbia, 1998)
2 case citations
WildEarth Guardians v. Chao
392 F. Supp. 3d 1192 (D. Montana, 2019)
1 case citations
Ca Energy Commission v. Doe
(Ninth Circuit, 2009)
Washington v. DOTP
84 F.3d 1222 (Tenth Circuit, 1996)
Michelotti v. United States
557 F. App'x 956 (Federal Circuit, 2014)

Source Credit

History

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 966.)

Editorial Notes

In subsection (a), the words "In a case of actual controversy as to the validity of" and "who will be . . . when it is effective" are omitted as surplus. The words "an order prescribing a motor vehicle safety standard under this chapter" are substituted for "any order under section 1392 of this title" for consistency. The words "apply for review" are added for clarity. The words "The petition must be filed" are substituted for "at any time" for clarity. The text of 15:1394(a)(3) is omitted as surplus because 5:ch. 7 applies unless otherwise stated.
In subsection (b), the words "or other officer designated by him for that purpose" are omitted as surplus because of 49:322(b). The words "in which the order was prescribed" are substituted for "on which the Secretary based his order" for consistency. The words "as provided in section 2112 of title 28" are omitted as surplus.
In subsection (c)(1), the words "in such manner and upon such terms and conditions as to the court may seem proper" are omitted as surplus. The words "is satisfied" are substituted for "shows to the satisfaction of" to eliminate unnecessary words. The words "and to be adduced upon the hearing" are omitted as unnecessary.
In subsection (c)(2), the words "with the court" are substituted for "the return of" for clarity.
In subsection (d), the words "thereof" and "criminal, exclusion of imports, or other" are omitted as surplus. The words "under this section" are substituted for "with respect to the order" for clarity. The word "previously" is omitted as surplus.
In subsection (e), the words "under this section is final and may be reviewed only" are substituted for "affirming or setting aside, in whole or in part, any such order of the Secretary shall be final, subject to review" to eliminate unnecessary words. The text of 15:1394(a)(5) is omitted because of rule 43 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure (28 App. U.S.C.).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 U.S.C. § 30161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/49/30161.