FEDERAL · 47 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER V–A—CABLE COMMUNICATIONS
Modification of franchise obligations
47 U.S.C. § 545
This text of 47 U.S.C. § 545 (Modification of franchise obligations) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
47 U.S.C. § 545.
Text
(a)Grounds for modification by franchising authority; public proceeding; time of decision
(1)During the period a franchise is in effect, the cable operator may obtain from the franchising authority modifications of the requirements in such franchise—
(A)in the case of any such requirement for facilities or equipment, including public, educational, or governmental access facilities or equipment, if the cable operator demonstrates that (i) it is commercially impracticable for the operator to comply with such requirement, and (ii) the proposal by the cable operator for modification of such requirement is appropriate because of commercial impracticability; or
(B)in the case of any such requirement for services, if the cable operator demonstrates that the mix, quality, and level of services
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
City Communications, Inc. v. The City of Detroit Barden Cable-Vision and MacLean
888 F.2d 1081 (Sixth Circuit, 1989)
Time Warner Entertainment Co., L.P. v. Federal Communications Commission United States of America, Nynex Corporation, Intervenors
56 F.3d 151 (D.C. Circuit, 1995)
Alliance for Community Media v. Federal Communications Commission
529 F.3d 763 (Sixth Circuit, 2008)
Rollins Cablevue, Inc. v. Saienni Enterprises
633 F. Supp. 1315 (D. Delaware, 1986)
Liberty Cable Co., Inc. v. City of New York
893 F. Supp. 191 (S.D. New York, 1995)
Council v. Department of Public Utility Control
788 A.2d 29 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2002)
I-Star Communications Corp. v. City of East Cleveland
885 F. Supp. 1035 (N.D. Ohio, 1995)
City of Ellensburg v. King Videocable Co.
912 P.2d 506 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1996)
Cablevision Systems Corp. v. Town of East Hampton
862 F. Supp. 875 (E.D. New York, 1994)
Tribune-United Cable of Montgomery County v. Montgomery County, Maryland Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Company of Chicago
784 F.2d 1227 (Fourth Circuit, 1986)
RCN Telecom Services of Philadelphia, Inc. v. Newtown Township
848 A.2d 1108 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2004)
Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Puerto Rico
698 F. Supp. 401 (D. Puerto Rico, 1988)
City of New York v. Federal Communications Commission
814 F.2d 720 (D.C. Circuit, 1987)
Jones Intercable v. City of Stevens Point, Wis.
729 F. Supp. 642 (W.D. Wisconsin, 1990)
American Civil Liberties Union v. Federal Communications Commission
823 F.2d 1554 (D.C. Circuit, 1987)
Beach Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
959 F.2d 975 (D.C. Circuit, 1992)
City of Detroit v. Michigan
879 F. Supp. 2d 680 (E.D. Michigan, 2012)
Villages of Larchmnt v. FCC
(Sixth Circuit, 2008)
Source Credit
History
(June 19, 1934, ch. 652, title VI, §625, as added Pub. L. 98–549, §2, Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 2790.)
Editorial Notes
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date
Section effective 60 days after Oct. 30, 1984, except where otherwise expressly provided, see section 9(a) of Pub. L. 98–549, set out as a note under section 521 of this title.
Effective Date
Section effective 60 days after Oct. 30, 1984, except where otherwise expressly provided, see section 9(a) of Pub. L. 98–549, set out as a note under section 521 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
47 U.S.C. § 545, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/47/545.