FEDERAL · 47 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER II—COMMON CARRIERS
Consolidations and mergers of telephone companies
47 U.S.C. § 221
This text of 47 U.S.C. § 221 (Consolidations and mergers of telephone companies) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
47 U.S.C. § 221.
Text
(a)Repealed. Pub. L. 104–104, title VI, §601(b)(2), Feb. 8, 1996, 110 Stat. 143
(b)State jurisdiction over services
Subject to the provisions of sections 225 and 301 of this title, nothing in this chapter shall be construed to apply, or to give the Commission jurisdiction, with respect to charges, classifications, practices, services, facilities, or regulations for or in connection with wire, mobile, or point-to-point radio telephone exchange service, or any combination thereof, even though a portion of such exchange service constitutes interstate or foreign communication, in any case where such matters are subject to regulation by a State commission or by local governmental authority.
(c)Determination of property used in interstate toll service
For the purpose of administering this cha
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.
351 U.S. 377 (Supreme Court, 1956)
United States v. Philadelphia National Bank
374 U.S. 321 (Supreme Court, 1963)
International Telephone and Telegraph Corporation v. General Telephone & Electronics Corporation and Hawaiian Telephone Company
518 F.2d 913 (Ninth Circuit, 1975)
Standard Oil Co. v. Federal Trade Commission
340 U.S. 231 (Supreme Court, 1951)
Benanti v. United States
355 U.S. 96 (Supreme Court, 1957)
Mid-Texas Communications Systems, Inc. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company
615 F.2d 1372 (Fifth Circuit, 1980)
Essential Communications Systems, Inc. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Company, Western Electric Company and New Jersey Bell Telephone Company
610 F.2d 1114 (Third Circuit, 1979)
National Ass'n of Regulatory Utility Commissioners v. Federal Communications Commission
737 F.2d 1095 (D.C. Circuit, 1984)
Direct Communications Cedar Valley, LLC v. Federal Communications Commission
753 F.3d 1015 (Tenth Circuit, 2014)
Mazzola v. Southern New England Telephone Co.
363 A.2d 170 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1975)
Puerto Rico Telephone Company v. Federal Communications Commission, and United States of America, Comtronics, Inc., Intervenor
553 F.2d 694 (First Circuit, 1977)
MCI Communications Corp. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
462 F. Supp. 1072 (N.D. Illinois, 1978)
Litton Systems, Inc. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
487 F. Supp. 942 (S.D. New York, 1980)
Midland Telecasting Company v. Midessa Television Company, Inc.
617 F.2d 1141 (Fifth Circuit, 1980)
National Association Of Regulatory Utility Commissioners v. Federal Communications Commission
533 F.2d 601 (D.C. Circuit, 1976)
Williams v. Public Service Commission
626 P.2d 564 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1981)
Essential Communication System, Inc. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
446 F. Supp. 1090 (D. New Jersey, 1978)
Benjamin W. Kitchen v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, the Bell Telephone Company of Pennsylvania, Intervenor
464 F.2d 801 (D.C. Circuit, 1972)
Matson Navigation Company v. Federal Maritime Commission and United States of America
405 F.2d 796 (Ninth Circuit, 1968)
Latin America/pacific Coast Steamship Conference and Its Member Lines v. Federal Maritime Commission and United States of America
465 F.2d 542 (D.C. Circuit, 1972)
Source Credit
History
(June 19, 1934, ch. 652, title II, §221, 48 Stat. 1080; Apr. 27, 1954, ch. 175, §4, 68 Stat. 64; Aug. 2, 1956, ch. 874, §3, 70 Stat. 932; Pub. L. 101–336, title IV, §401(b)(2), July 26, 1990, 104 Stat. 369; Pub. L. 104–104, title VI, §601(b)(2), Feb. 8, 1996, 110 Stat. 143.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
References in Text
This chapter, referred to in subsecs. (b) and (c), was in the original "this Act", meaning act June 19, 1934, ch. 652, 48 Stat. 1064, known as the Communications Act of 1934, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 609 of this title and Tables.
Amendments
1996—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 104–104 struck out subsec. (a) relating to notification of State Governor and State commission, public hearing, and certification.
1990—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 101–336 substituted "sections 225 and 301" for "section 301".
1956—Subsec. (a). Act Aug. 2, 1956, inserted provisions relating to submission of comments by parties and required a public hearing upon request, in lieu of former provisions requiring hearing upon application.
1954—Subsec. (b). Act Apr. 27, 1954, included mobile or point-to-point radio telephone exchange service within exclusions provided for in such subsection, where it is subject to regulation by a State commission or by local governmental authority, and made it clear that the Commission retains its licensing authority over the radio stations that might be involved in such service.
References in Text
This chapter, referred to in subsecs. (b) and (c), was in the original "this Act", meaning act June 19, 1934, ch. 652, 48 Stat. 1064, known as the Communications Act of 1934, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 609 of this title and Tables.
Amendments
1996—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 104–104 struck out subsec. (a) relating to notification of State Governor and State commission, public hearing, and certification.
1990—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 101–336 substituted "sections 225 and 301" for "section 301".
1956—Subsec. (a). Act Aug. 2, 1956, inserted provisions relating to submission of comments by parties and required a public hearing upon request, in lieu of former provisions requiring hearing upon application.
1954—Subsec. (b). Act Apr. 27, 1954, included mobile or point-to-point radio telephone exchange service within exclusions provided for in such subsection, where it is subject to regulation by a State commission or by local governmental authority, and made it clear that the Commission retains its licensing authority over the radio stations that might be involved in such service.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
47 U.S.C. § 221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/47/221.