FEDERAL · 47 U.S.C. · Chapter 5
Recovery of damages
Current through Pub. L. 119-102
Any person claiming to be damaged by any common carrier subject to the provisions of this chapter may either make complaint to the Commission as hereinafter provided for, or may bring suit for the recovery of the damages for which such common carrier may be liable under the provisions of this chapter, in any district court of the United States of competent jurisdiction; but such person shall not have the right to pursue both such remedies.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
47 U.S.C. § 207 (Recovery of damages) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ivy Broadcasting Company, Inc. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company and New York Telephone Company, Defendants-Appellees-Appellants
391 F.2d 486 (Second Circuit, 1968)
National Communications Association, Inc. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company
46 F.3d 220 (Second Circuit, 1995)
Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc. v. Metrophones Telecommunications, Inc.
550 U.S. 45 (Supreme Court, 2007)
In Re Long Distance Telecommunications Litigation. Charles Kaplan v. itt-u.s. Transmission Systems, Inc., Roger Lee v. Western Union Telegraph Company
831 F.2d 627 (Sixth Circuit, 1987)
Chair King, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees v. Houston Cellular Corporation, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants, Karen Laake, Etc.
131 F.3d 507 (Fifth Circuit, 1997)
Panatronic Usa, a California General Partnership Lemar Textile Co. v. At&t Corporation
287 F.3d 840 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)
Richard Goldwasser, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Ameritech Corporation
222 F.3d 390 (Seventh Circuit, 2000)
McGuire v. Ameritech Services, Inc.
253 F. Supp. 2d 988 (S.D. Ohio, 2003)
MCI Communications Corp. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
462 F. Supp. 1072 (N.D. Illinois, 1978)
Law Offices of Curtis v. Trinko, L.L.P., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Bell Atlantic Corporation
305 F.3d 89 (Second Circuit, 2002)
Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company v. Allnet Communication Services, Inc., Cross-Appellee
17 F.3d 921 (Sixth Circuit, 1994)
Stiles v. GTE Southwest Inc.
128 F.3d 904 (Fifth Circuit, 1997)
Timothy A. Rogers, Wendy A. Rogers, and Alan Westfall, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Tyson Foods, Incorporated
308 F.3d 785 (Seventh Circuit, 2002)
Greene v. Sprint Communications Co.
340 F.3d 1047 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)
Digitel, Inc. v. MCI Worldcom, Inc.
239 F.3d 187 (Second Circuit, 2001)
Litton Systems, Inc. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
487 F. Supp. 942 (S.D. New York, 1980)
Telecom International America, Ltd. v. AT & T Corp.
67 F. Supp. 2d 189 (S.D. New York, 1999)
Dreamscape Design, Inc. v. Affinity Network, Inc.
414 F.3d 665 (Seventh Circuit, 2005)
Premiere Network Services, Inc. v. SBC Communications, Inc.
440 F.3d 683 (Fifth Circuit, 2006)
Gilmore v. Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, L.L.C.
210 F.R.D. 212 (N.D. Illinois, 2001)
Source Credit
History
(June 19, 1934, ch. 652, title II, §207, 48 Stat. 1073.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
References in Text
This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning act June 19, 1934, ch. 652, 48 Stat. 1064, known as the Communications Act of 1934, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 609 of this title and Tables.
References in Text
This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning act June 19, 1934, ch. 652, 48 Stat. 1064, known as the Communications Act of 1934, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 609 of this title and Tables.