FEDERAL · 47 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER II—COMMON CARRIERS
Discriminations and preferences
47 U.S.C. § 202
This text of 47 U.S.C. § 202 (Discriminations and preferences) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
47 U.S.C. § 202.
Text
(a)Charges, services, etc.
It shall be unlawful for any common carrier to make any unjust or unreasonable discrimination in charges, practices, classifications, regulations, facilities, or services for or in connection with like communication service, directly or indirectly, by any means or device, or to make or give any undue or unreasonable preference or advantage to any particular person, class of persons, or locality, or to subject any particular person, class of persons, or locality to any undue or unreasonable prejudice or disadvantage.
(b)Charges or services included
Charges or services, whenever referred to in this chapter, include charges for, or services in connection with, the use of common carrier lines of communication, whether derived from wire or radio facilities, in chain
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
512 U.S. 218 (Supreme Court, 1994)
Tenore v. AT&T Wireless Services
962 P.2d 104 (Washington Supreme Court, 1998)
Essential Communications Systems, Inc. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Company, Western Electric Company and New Jersey Bell Telephone Company
610 F.2d 1114 (Third Circuit, 1979)
National Ass'n of Regulatory Utility Commissioners v. Federal Communications Commission
737 F.2d 1095 (D.C. Circuit, 1984)
Brittan Communications International Corp. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.
313 F.3d 899 (Fifth Circuit, 2002)
Atlas Roofing Company, Inc. v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, United States Department Oflabor
518 F.2d 990 (Fifth Circuit, 1975)
Russell P. Miller and Margaret Jane Miller, His Wife v. American Telephone & Telegraph Company (Hereafter At&t)
507 F.2d 759 (Third Circuit, 1974)
Air Transport Association of America v. Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, Defendants
833 F.2d 200 (Ninth Circuit, 1987)
Prometheus Radio Project v. Federal Communications Commission
652 F.3d 431 (Third Circuit, 2011)
Western Union International, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
568 F.2d 1012 (Second Circuit, 1977)
NetChoice v. Paxton
49 F.4th 439 (Fifth Circuit, 2022)
Gilmore v. Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, L.L.C.
210 F.R.D. 212 (N.D. Illinois, 2001)
The Associated Press v. The Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, American Telephone and Telegraph Co., Intervenor
452 F.2d 1290 (D.C. Circuit, 1971)
American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Hughes Television Network, Inc., Intervenors
663 F.2d 133 (D.C. Circuit, 1980)
McDonnell Douglas Corporation v. General Telephone Company of California and General Telephone and Electronics Corporation
594 F.2d 720 (Ninth Circuit, 1979)
Todd Heath v. Wisconsin Bell, Inc.
92 F.4th 654 (Seventh Circuit, 2023)
Central Office Telephone, Inc. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
108 F.3d 981 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)
Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. United States
42 F.3d 181 (Fourth Circuit, 1994)
Eagleview Technologies, Inc. v. MDS Associates
190 F.3d 1195 (Eleventh Circuit, 1999)
United States Transmission Systems, Inc. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
564 F. Supp. 1020 (S.D. New York, 1983)
Source Credit
History
(June 19, 1934, ch. 652, title II, §202, 48 Stat. 1070; Pub. L. 86–751, Sept. 13, 1960, 74 Stat. 888; Pub. L. 101–239, title III, §3002(a), Dec. 19, 1989, 103 Stat. 2131.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
References in Text
This chapter, referred to in subsec. (b), was in the original "this Act", meaning act June 19, 1934, ch. 652, 48 Stat. 1064, known as the Communications Act of 1934, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 609 of this title and Tables.
Amendments
1989—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 101–239 substituted "$6,000" for "$500" and "$300" for "$25".
1960—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 86–751 substituted "common carrier lines of communication, whether derived from wire or radio facilities," for "wires".
References in Text
This chapter, referred to in subsec. (b), was in the original "this Act", meaning act June 19, 1934, ch. 652, 48 Stat. 1064, known as the Communications Act of 1934, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 609 of this title and Tables.
Amendments
1989—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 101–239 substituted "$6,000" for "$500" and "$300" for "$25".
1960—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 86–751 substituted "common carrier lines of communication, whether derived from wire or radio facilities," for "wires".
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
47 U.S.C. § 202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/47/202.