FEDERAL · 46 U.S.C. · Chapter 301
Personal injury to or death of seamen
46 U.S.C. § 30104
Title46 — Shipping
Chapter301 — GENERAL LIABILITY PROVISIONS
This text of 46 U.S.C. § 30104 (Personal injury to or death of seamen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
46 U.S.C. § 30104.
Text
(a)In General.—A seaman injured in the course of employment or, if the seaman dies from the injury, the personal representative of the seaman may elect to bring a civil action at law, with the right of trial by jury, against the employer. Laws of the United States regulating recovery for personal injury to, or death of, a railway employee apply to an action under this section.
(b)Limitation on Recovery by Aquaculture Workers.—
(1)In general.—For purposes of subsection (a), the term "seaman" does not include an individual who—
(A)is an aquaculture worker if State workers' compensation is available to such individual; and
(B)was, at the time of injury, engaged in aquaculture in a place where such individual had lawful access.
(2)Aquaculture worker defined.—In this subsection, the term
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Atlantic Sounding Co. v. Townsend
557 U.S. 404 (Supreme Court, 2009)
Loya v. Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc.
583 F.3d 656 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)
Manderson v. Chet Morrison Contractors, Inc.
666 F.3d 373 (Fifth Circuit, 2012)
Park v. Stockstill Boat Rentals, Inc.
492 F.3d 600 (Fifth Circuit, 2007)
Sentry Select Insurance v. Royal Insurance Co. of America
481 F.3d 1208 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)
Cain v. Transocean Offshore USA, Inc.
518 F.3d 295 (Fifth Circuit, 2008)
Jody King v. Huntress, Inc.
94 A.3d 467 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 2014)
Martin v. Harris
560 F.3d 210 (Fourth Circuit, 2009)
Endicott v. Icicle Seafoods, Inc.
224 P.3d 761 (Washington Supreme Court, 2010)
Graham v. Offshore Specialty Fabricators, Inc.
37 So. 3d 1002 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2010)
In re Bridge Construction Services of Florida, Inc.
39 F. Supp. 3d 373 (S.D. New York, 2014)
Sloan v. United States
603 F. Supp. 2d 798 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2009)
Brent Adkins v. Marathon Petroleum Co., LP
105 F.4th 841 (Sixth Circuit, 2024)
Peru v. Sharpshooter Spectrum Venture LLC
493 F.3d 1058 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)
Willis v. Fugro Chance, Inc.
278 F. App'x 443 (Fifth Circuit, 2008)
CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Gardner
874 N.E.2d 357 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2007)
Denehy v. Massachusetts Port Authority
42 F. Supp. 3d 301 (D. Massachusetts, 2014)
Moore v. Bis Salamis, Inc.
748 F. Supp. 2d 598 (E.D. Texas, 2010)
McBride v. Estis Well Service, LLC
872 F. Supp. 2d 511 (W.D. Louisiana, 2012)
Willis v. Fugro Chance, Inc.
569 F. Supp. 2d 712 (E.D. Texas, 2007)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 109–304, §6(c), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1510; Pub. L. 110–181, div. C, title XXXV, §3521(a), Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 596; Pub. L. 117–263, div. K, title CXV, §11520(a), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 4142.)
Editorial Notes
In subsection (a), the words "A seaman injured in the course of employment or, if the seaman dies from the injury, the personal representative of the seaman" are substituted for "Any seaman who shall suffer personal injury in the course of his employment" and "in case of the death of any seaman as a result of any such personal injury the personal representative" to eliminate unnecessary words. The words "bring a civil action" are substituted for "maintain an action" for consistency with rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (28 App. U.S.C.). The words "for damages" are omitted as unnecessary. The words "against the employer" are added for clarity. The words "Laws of the United States regulating recovery for personal injury to, or death of, a railway employee" are substituted for "all statutes of the United States modifying or extending the common-law right or remedy in cases of personal injury to railway employees" and "all statutes of the United States conferring or regulating the right of action for death in the case of railway employees" to eliminate unnecessary words.
In subsection (b), the words "An action under this section shall be brought" are substituted for "Jurisdiction in such actions shall be under" because 46 App. U.S.C. 688(a) (last sentence) provides for venue, not jurisdiction. Panama R.R. Co. v. Johnson, 264 U.S. 375 (1924). As to the relationship between 46 App. U.S.C. 688(a) (last sentence) and 28 U.S.C. 1391(c), see Pure Oil Co. v. Suarez, 384 U.S. 202 (1966).
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2022—Pub. L. 117–263 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), inserted heading, and added subsec. (b).
2008—Pub. L. 110–181 struck out subsec. (a) designation and heading before "A seaman injured" and struck out heading and text of subsec. (b). Text read as follows: "An action under this section shall be brought in the judicial district in which the employer resides or the employer's principal office is located."
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2022 Amendment
Pub. L. 117–263, div. K, title CXV, §11520(b), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 4143, provided that: "The amendments made by this section [amending this section] shall apply to an injury incurred on or after the date of enactment of this Act [Dec. 23, 2022]."
Effective Date of 2008 Amendment
Pub. L. 110–181, div. C, title XXXV, §3521(b), Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 596, provided that: "The amendment made by subsection (a) [amending this section] shall be effective as if included in the enactment of Public Law 109–304."
In subsection (b), the words "An action under this section shall be brought" are substituted for "Jurisdiction in such actions shall be under" because 46 App. U.S.C. 688(a) (last sentence) provides for venue, not jurisdiction. Panama R.R. Co. v. Johnson, 264 U.S. 375 (1924). As to the relationship between 46 App. U.S.C. 688(a) (last sentence) and 28 U.S.C. 1391(c), see Pure Oil Co. v. Suarez, 384 U.S. 202 (1966).
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2022—Pub. L. 117–263 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), inserted heading, and added subsec. (b).
2008—Pub. L. 110–181 struck out subsec. (a) designation and heading before "A seaman injured" and struck out heading and text of subsec. (b). Text read as follows: "An action under this section shall be brought in the judicial district in which the employer resides or the employer's principal office is located."
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2022 Amendment
Pub. L. 117–263, div. K, title CXV, §11520(b), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 4143, provided that: "The amendments made by this section [amending this section] shall apply to an injury incurred on or after the date of enactment of this Act [Dec. 23, 2022]."
Effective Date of 2008 Amendment
Pub. L. 110–181, div. C, title XXXV, §3521(b), Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 596, provided that: "The amendment made by subsection (a) [amending this section] shall be effective as if included in the enactment of Public Law 109–304."
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
46 U.S.C. § 30104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/46/30104.