FEDERAL · 44 U.S.C. · Chapter 29
Disclosure requirement for official business conducted using non-official electronic messaging accounts
44 U.S.C. § 2911
Title44 — Public Printing and Documents
Chapter29 — RECORDS MANAGEMENT BY THE ARCHIVIST OF THE UNITED STATES AND BY THE ADMINISTRATOR OF GENERAL SERVICES
This text of 44 U.S.C. § 2911 (Disclosure requirement for official business conducted using non-official electronic messaging accounts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
44 U.S.C. § 2911.
Text
(a)In General.—An officer or employee of an executive agency may not create or send a record using a non-official electronic messaging account unless such officer or employee—
(1)copies an official electronic messaging account of the officer or employee in the original creation or transmission of the record; or
(2)forwards a complete copy of the record to an official electronic messaging account of the officer or employee not later than 20 days after the original creation or transmission of the record.
(b)Adverse Actions.—The intentional violation of subsection (a) (including any rules, regulations, or other implementing guidelines), as determined by the appropriate supervisor, shall be a basis for disciplinary action in accordance with subchapter I, II, or V of chapter 75 of title 5,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
City of San Jose v. Superior Court of Santa Clara Cnty.
389 P.3d 848 (California Supreme Court, 2017)
In re: Hillary Clinton (REVISED)
973 F.3d 106 (D.C. Circuit, 2020)
Competitive Enterprise Institute v. Office of Science and Technology Policy
241 F. Supp. 3d 14 (District of Columbia, 2017)
Brennan Ctr. for Justice At N.Y. Univ. Sch. of Law v. U.S. Dep't of Justice
377 F. Supp. 3d 428 (S.D. Illinois, 2019)
Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Kerry
156 F. Supp. 3d 69 (District of Columbia, 2016)
In re: Hillary Clinton
970 F.3d 357 (D.C. Circuit, 2020)
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ripple Labs Inc.
(S.D. New York, 2021)
Wright v. Administration for Children and Families
(District of Columbia, 2016)
Bader Family Foundation v. United States Department of Education
(District of Columbia, 2022)
Wright v. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
(District of Columbia, 2025)
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. Pompeo
(District of Columbia, 2020)
Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Bureau of Land Management
(District of Columbia, 2021)
Kilmer v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(District of Columbia, 2021)
Brennan Center for Justice v. U.S. Department of Justice
(S.D. New York, 2019)
Stevens v. Broadcasting Board of Governors
(N.D. Illinois, 2021)
State of Iowa v. Steven Edward Struve
(Supreme Court of Iowa, 2021)
American Oversight v. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
(District of Columbia, 2020)
Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
(District of Columbia, 2019)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 113–187, §10(a), Nov. 26, 2014, 128 Stat. 2014.)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
44 U.S.C. § 2911, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/44/2911.