FEDERAL · 42 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER II—PUBLIC SERVICES
Public transportation programs and activities in existing facilities and one car per train rule
42 U.S.C. § 12148
Title42 — The Public Health and Welfare
ChapterSUBCHAPTER II—PUBLIC SERVICES
Partsubpart i—public transportation other than by aircraft or certain rail operations
This text of 42 U.S.C. § 12148 (Public transportation programs and activities in existing facilities and one car per train rule) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
42 U.S.C. § 12148.
Text
(a)Public transportation programs and activities in existing facilities
With respect to existing facilities used in the provision of designated public transportation services, it shall be considered discrimination, for purposes of section 12132 of this title and section 794 of title 29, for a public entity to fail to operate a designated public transportation program or activity conducted in such facilities so that, when viewed in the entirety, the program or activity is readily accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities.
Paragraph (1) shall not require a public entity to make structural changes to existing facilities in order to make such facilities accessible to individuals who use wheelchairs, unless and to the extent required by section 12147(a) of this title (relating
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Stafford J. Coolbaugh v. State of Louisiana, on Behalf of la.dept. Of Public Safety & Corr., on Behalf of La. Dept. Of Motor Vehicles
136 F.3d 430 (Fifth Circuit, 1998)
Brooklyn Ctr. for Indep. of the Disabled v. Metro. Transp. Auth.
11 F.4th 55 (Second Circuit, 2021)
George v. Bay Area Rapid Transit
577 F.3d 1005 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)
Woods v. Centro of Oneida, Inc.
103 F.4th 933 (Second Circuit, 2024)
Schulz v. Bay Area Motivate, LLC
(N.D. California, 2019)
Coolbaugh v. La State
(Fifth Circuit, 1998)
George v. Bart
(Ninth Circuit, 2009)
Gustafson v. Bi-State Development Agency of the Missouri-Illinois Metropolitan District
(E.D. Missouri, 2020)
O.E. v. New Orleans Regional Transit Authority
(E.D. Louisiana, 2024)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 101–336, title II, §228, July 26, 1990, 104 Stat. 344.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
References in Text
The effective date of this section, referred to in subsec. (b)(1), probably means the effective date of subsec. (b), which is effective on date of enactment of Pub. L. 101–336, which was approved July 26, 1990. The effective date of subsec. (a) is 18 months after July 26, 1990. See section 231 of Pub. L. 101–336, set out as an Effective Date note under section 12141 of this title.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date
Subsec. (a) of this section effective 18 months after July 26, 1990, and subsec. (b) of this section effective July 26, 1990, see section 231 of Pub. L. 101–336, set out as a note under section 12141 of this title.
References in Text
The effective date of this section, referred to in subsec. (b)(1), probably means the effective date of subsec. (b), which is effective on date of enactment of Pub. L. 101–336, which was approved July 26, 1990. The effective date of subsec. (a) is 18 months after July 26, 1990. See section 231 of Pub. L. 101–336, set out as an Effective Date note under section 12141 of this title.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date
Subsec. (a) of this section effective 18 months after July 26, 1990, and subsec. (b) of this section effective July 26, 1990, see section 231 of Pub. L. 101–336, set out as a note under section 12141 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
42 U.S.C. § 12148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/42/12148.