FEDERAL · 42 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER II—PUBLIC SERVICES
Alterations of existing facilities
42 U.S.C. § 12147
Title42 — The Public Health and Welfare
ChapterSUBCHAPTER II—PUBLIC SERVICES
Partsubpart i—public transportation other than by aircraft or certain rail operations
This text of 42 U.S.C. § 12147 (Alterations of existing facilities) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
42 U.S.C. § 12147.
Text
(a)General rule
With respect to alterations of an existing facility or part thereof used in the provision of designated public transportation services that affect or could affect the usability of the facility or part thereof, it shall be considered discrimination, for purposes of section 12132 of this title and section 794 of title 29, for a public entity to fail to make such alterations (or to ensure that the alterations are made) in such a manner that, to the maximum extent feasible, the altered portions of the facility are readily accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities, including individuals who use wheelchairs, upon the completion of such alterations. Where the public entity is undertaking an alteration that affects or could affect usability of or access to an area
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Disabled in Action of Pennsylvania v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
539 F.3d 199 (Third Circuit, 2008)
Disabled in Action v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
635 F.3d 87 (Third Circuit, 2011)
Frame v. City of Arlington
575 F.3d 432 (Fifth Circuit, 2009)
Hip Heightened Independence an v. Port Authority of New York and
693 F.3d 345 (Third Circuit, 2012)
Neighborhood Ass'n of the Back Bay, Inc. v. Federal Transit Administration
463 F.3d 50 (First Circuit, 2006)
Cupolo v. Bay Area Rapid Transit
5 F. Supp. 2d 1078 (N.D. California, 1997)
Martin v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority
225 F. Supp. 2d 1362 (N.D. Georgia, 2002)
George v. Bay Area Rapid Transit
577 F.3d 1005 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)
Rosa v. Lewis Foods of 42nd Street, LLC
124 F. Supp. 3d 290 (S.D. New York, 2015)
Woods v. Centro of Oneida, Inc.
103 F.4th 933 (Second Circuit, 2024)
American Council of the Blind v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
133 F. Supp. 2d 66 (District of Columbia, 2001)
Walter v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
434 F. Supp. 2d 346 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2006)
Bronx Independent Living v. Metropolitan Transp.
358 F. Supp. 3d 324 (S.D. Illinois, 2019)
Hassan v. Slater
41 F. Supp. 2d 343 (E.D. New York, 1999)
Katzowitz v. Long Island Railroad
58 F. Supp. 2d 34 (E.D. New York, 1999)
Guadagnini v. SamTrans
(N.D. California, 2021)
Disabled in Action v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
655 F. Supp. 2d 553 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2009)
Disabled Action PA v. SEPTA
(Third Circuit, 2008)
George v. Bart
(Ninth Circuit, 2009)
LIBERTY RESOURCES, INC. v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
(E.D. Pennsylvania, 2021)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 101–336, title II, §227, July 26, 1990, 104 Stat. 343.)
Editorial Notes
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date
Subsec. (a) of this section effective 18 months after July 26, 1990, and subsec. (b) of this section effective July 26, 1990, see section 231 of Pub. L. 101–336, set out as a note under section 12141 of this title.
Effective Date
Subsec. (a) of this section effective 18 months after July 26, 1990, and subsec. (b) of this section effective July 26, 1990, see section 231 of Pub. L. 101–336, set out as a note under section 12141 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
42 U.S.C. § 12147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/42/12147.