FEDERAL · 39 U.S.C. · Chapter 12
Suits
39 U.S.C. § 1208
Title39 — Postal Service
Chapter12 — EMPLOYEE-MANAGEMENT AGREEMENTS
This text of 39 U.S.C. § 1208 (Suits) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
39 U.S.C. § 1208.
Text
(a)The courts of the United States shall have jurisdiction with respect to actions brought by the National Labor Relations Board under this chapter to the same extent that they have jurisdiction with respect to actions under title 29.
(b)Suits for violation of contracts between the Postal Service and a labor organization representing Postal Service employees, or between any such labor organizations, may be brought in any district court of the United States having jurisdiction of the parties, without respect to the amount in controversy.
(c)A labor organization and the Postal Service shall be bound by the authorized acts of their agents. Any labor organization may sue or be sued as an entity and in behalf of the employees whom it represents in the courts of the United States. Any money j
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Philip J. Podobnik v. United States Postal Service National Rural Letter Carriers Association John E. Potter, Postmaster General of the United States
409 F.3d 584 (Third Circuit, 2005)
Jose J. Roman v. United States Postal Service
821 F.2d 382 (Seventh Circuit, 1987)
Joan Bacashihua, American Postal Workers Union v. United States Postal Service
859 F.2d 402 (Sixth Circuit, 1988)
National Labor Relations Board v. American Postal Workers Union, St. Louis, Missouri Local Afl-Cio and United States Postal Service
618 F.2d 1249 (Eighth Circuit, 1980)
National Association of Letter Carriers, Afl-Cio v. United States Postal Service
590 F.2d 1171 (D.C. Circuit, 1978)
National Ass'n of Letter Carriers v. Sombrotto
449 F.2d 915 (Second Circuit, 1971)
James Abernathy v. United States Postal Service
740 F.2d 612 (Eighth Circuit, 1984)
Ray Melendy v. United States Postal Service and National Association of Letter Carriers, Afl-Cio
589 F.2d 256 (Seventh Circuit, 1978)
Matthews v. Milwaukee Area Local Postal Workers Union
495 F.3d 438 (Seventh Circuit, 2007)
Florence v. Frank
774 F. Supp. 1054 (N.D. Texas, 1991)
Lawson v. Truck Drivers, Chauffeurs & Helpers
698 F.2d 250 (Sixth Circuit, 1983)
Withers v. United States Postal Service
417 F. Supp. 1 (W.D. Missouri, 1976)
Clarence Houser, Jr. v. Postmaster General of the Unit
573 F. App'x 141 (Third Circuit, 2014)
American Postal Workers Union v. United States Postal Service
755 F. Supp. 1076 (District of Columbia, 1989)
Husowitz v. American Postal Workers Union
190 F.R.D. 53 (E.D. New York, 1999)
Walker v. Runyon
979 F. Supp. 1363 (D. Kansas, 1997)
Local 300, National Postal Mail Handlers Union v. National Postal Mail Handlers Union
764 F. Supp. 199 (District of Columbia, 1991)
Clipper v. Frank
704 F. Supp. 285 (District of Columbia, 1989)
Talley v. United States Postal Service
526 F. Supp. 151 (D. Minnesota, 1981)
Elliott v. United States Postal Service
621 F. Supp. 1093 (W.D. Michigan, 1985)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 91–375, Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 736.)
Editorial Notes
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date
Section effective July 1, 1971, pursuant to Resolution No. 71–9 of the Board of Governors. See section 15(a) of Pub. L. 91–375, set out as a note preceding section 101 of this title.
Effective Date
Section effective July 1, 1971, pursuant to Resolution No. 71–9 of the Board of Governors. See section 15(a) of Pub. L. 91–375, set out as a note preceding section 101 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
39 U.S.C. § 1208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/39/1208.