FEDERAL · 39 U.S.C. · Chapter 12
Bargaining units
39 U.S.C. § 1202
Title39 — Postal Service
Chapter12 — EMPLOYEE-MANAGEMENT AGREEMENTS
This text of 39 U.S.C. § 1202 (Bargaining units) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
39 U.S.C. § 1202.
Text
The National Labor Relations Board shall decide in each case the unit appropriate for collective bargaining in the Postal Service. The National Labor Relations Board shall not include in any bargaining unit—
(1)any management official or supervisor;
(2)any employee engaged in personnel work in other than a purely nonconfidential clerical capacity;
(3)both professional employees and employees who are not professional employees unless a majority of such professional employees vote for inclusion in such unit; or
(4)together with other employees, any individual employed as a security guard to enforce against employees and other persons, rules to protect property of the Postal Service or to protect the safety of property, mail, or persons on the premises of the Postal Service; but no labor
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
David D. Bolton v. Merit Systems Protection Board
154 F.3d 1313 (Federal Circuit, 1998)
National Labor Relations Board v. United States Postal Service and American Postal Workers Union
833 F.2d 1195 (Sixth Circuit, 1987)
National Ass'n of Postal Supervisors v. United States Postal Service
602 F.2d 420 (D.C. Circuit, 1979)
Geraldine L. McCandless and Fleetwood S. Quittley and Deborah M. Kintner v. Merit Systems Protection Board
996 F.2d 1193 (Federal Circuit, 1993)
Hickman v. United States
43 Fed. Cl. 424 (Federal Claims, 1999)
Eugene G. Chin v. The United States
890 F.2d 1143 (Federal Circuit, 1989)
National Ass'n of Let. Car. v. Independent Post. S. of A., Inc.
336 F. Supp. 804 (W.D. Oklahoma, 1971)
Fraternal Order of Police, National Labor Council, USPS No. 2 v. United States Postal Service
988 F. Supp. 701 (S.D. New York, 1997)
Milner v. Bolger
546 F. Supp. 375 (E.D. California, 1982)
National Association of Postal Supervisors v. United States Postal Service, National Association of Postmasters of the United States v. United States Postal Service, National Association of Postmasters of the United States v. United States Postal Service
602 F.2d 420 (D.C. Circuit, 1979)
James M. Carrier,petitioner v. Merit Systems Protection Board, and United States Postal Service, Intervenor
183 F.3d 1376 (Federal Circuit, 1999)
National Alliance of Postal and Federal Employees v. E. T. Klassen, Individually and as Postmaster General of the United States, Etal
514 F.2d 189 (D.C. Circuit, 1975)
Clete E. Coursen v. United States Postal Service
256 F.3d 1353 (Federal Circuit, 2001)
Tilley v. Frank
728 F. Supp. 1293 (M.D. Louisiana, 1990)
National Labor Relations Board v. U.S. Postal Service
827 F.2d 548 (Ninth Circuit, 1987)
Bruce Blackerby v. United States Postal Service
(Merit Systems Protection Board, 2022)
D'Andrea Harris v. United States Postal Service
(Merit Systems Protection Board, 2022)
Loretta Hayden v. United States Postal Service
(Merit Systems Protection Board, 2015)
Monifah A. Hamilton v. United States Postal Service
2016 MSPB 22 (Merit Systems Protection Board, 2016)
Reedy v. Merit Systems Protection Board
10 F. App'x 923 (Federal Circuit, 2001)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 91–375, Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 733.)
Editorial Notes
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date
Section effective July 1, 1971, pursuant to Resolution No. 71–9 of the Board of Governors. See section 15(a) of Pub. L. 91–375, set out as a note preceding section 101 of this title.
Effective Date
Section effective July 1, 1971, pursuant to Resolution No. 71–9 of the Board of Governors. See section 15(a) of Pub. L. 91–375, set out as a note preceding section 101 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
39 U.S.C. § 1202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/39/1202.