FEDERAL · 38 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER II—EMPLOYMENT AND REEMPLOYMENT RIGHTS AND LIMITATIONS; PROHIBITIONS

Discrimination against persons who serve in the uniformed services and acts of reprisal prohibited

38 U.S.C. § 4311
Title38Veterans' Benefits
ChapterSUBCHAPTER II—EMPLOYMENT AND REEMPLOYMENT RIGHTS AND LIMITATIONS; PROHIBITIONS

This text of 38 U.S.C. § 4311 (Discrimination against persons who serve in the uniformed services and acts of reprisal prohibited) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
38 U.S.C. § 4311.

Text

(a)A person who is a member of, applies to be a member of, performs, has performed, applies to perform, or has an obligation to perform service in a uniformed service shall not be denied initial employment, reemployment, retention in employment, promotion, or any benefit of employment by an employer on the basis of that membership, application for membership, performance of service, application for service, or obligation.
(b)An employer may not discriminate in employment against or take any adverse employment action or other retaliatory action against any person because such person (1) has taken an action to enforce a protection afforded any person under this chapter, (2) has testified or otherwise made a statement in or in connection with any proceeding under this chapter, (3) has assis

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kirkendall v. Department of the Army
479 F.3d 830 (Federal Circuit, 2007)
55 case citations
Morris-Hayes v. Board of Education of the Chester Union Free School District
423 F.3d 153 (Second Circuit, 2005)
33 case citations
Meléndez-García v. Sánchez
629 F.3d 25 (First Circuit, 2010)
22 case citations
Pittman v. Department of Justice
486 F.3d 1276 (Federal Circuit, 2007)
15 case citations
Mock v. City of Rome
851 F. Supp. 2d 428 (N.D. New York, 2012)
12 case citations
Hart v. Township of Hillside
228 F. App'x 159 (Third Circuit, 2007)
4 case citations
Patterson v. Office of Personnel Management
111 F. App'x 590 (Federal Circuit, 2004)
4 case citations
Thomas Carter v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
650 F. App'x 896 (Seventh Circuit, 2016)
1 case citations
Tole v. Amazon.com Inc
(W.D. Washington, 2024)
Cain v. Exxon Mobile Corporation
(M.D. Louisiana, 2019)
City of Denton v. Michael Grim and Jim Maynard
(Court of Appeals of Texas, 2022)
William B. Jolley v. Department of Justice
(Merit Systems Protection Board, 2014)
Lillie M. Middlebrooks v. Social Security Administration
(Merit Systems Protection Board, 2014)
Lowell D. Shackelford v. Department of the Army
(Merit Systems Protection Board, 2015)
Jeffrey L. Bostwick v. Department of Agriculture
2015 MSPB 21 (Merit Systems Protection Board, 2015)
David B. White v. Department of Veterans Affairs
(Merit Systems Protection Board, 2015)
Hart v. Hillside Twp
(Third Circuit, 2007)

Source Credit

History

(Added Pub. L. 103–353, §2(a), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3153; amended Pub. L. 104–275, title III, §311(3), Oct. 9, 1996, 110 Stat. 3334; Pub. L. 118–210, title II, §221(b), Jan. 2, 2025, 138 Stat. 2778.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Prior Provisions
A prior section 4311 was renumbered section 7611 of this title.

Amendments
2025—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 118–210 inserted "or other retaliatory action" after "employment action".
1996—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 104–275 added subsec. (b) and struck out former subsec. (b) which read as follows: "An employer shall be considered to have denied a person initial employment, reemployment, retention in employment, promotion, or a benefit of employment in violation of this section if the person's membership, application for membership, service, application for service, or obligation for service in the uniformed services is a motivating factor in the employer's action, unless the employer can prove that the action would have been taken in the absence of such membership, application for membership, performance of service, application for service, or obligation."
Subsecs. (c), (d). Pub. L. 104–275 added subsecs. (c) and (d) and struck out former subsec. (c) which read as follows:
"(c)(1) An employer may not discriminate in employment against or take any adverse employment action against any person because such person has taken an action to enforce a protection afforded any person under this chapter, has testified or otherwise made a statement in or in connection with any proceeding under this chapter, has assisted or otherwise participated in an investigation under this chapter, or has exercised a right provided for in this chapter.
"(2) The prohibition in paragraph (1) shall apply with respect to a person regardless of whether that person has performed service in the uniformed services and shall apply to any position of employment, including a position that is described in section 4312(d)(1)(C)."

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 1996 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 104–275 effective Oct. 13, 1994, see section 313 of Pub. L. 104–275, set out as a note under section 4301 of this title.

Effective Date
Section effective Oct. 13, 1994, except as otherwise provided, see section 8 of Pub. L. 103–353, set out as a note under section 4301 of this title.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 U.S.C. § 4311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/38/4311.