FEDERAL · 35 U.S.C. · Chapter 31

Institution of inter partes review

35 U.S.C. § 314
Title35Patents
Chapter31 — INTER PARTES REVIEW

This text of 35 U.S.C. § 314 (Institution of inter partes review) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
35 U.S.C. § 314.

Text

(a)Threshold.—The Director may not authorize an inter partes review to be instituted unless the Director determines that the information presented in the petition filed under section 311 and any response filed under section 313 shows that there is a reasonable likelihood that the petitioner would prevail with respect to at least 1 of the claims challenged in the petition.
(b)Timing.—The Director shall determine whether to institute an inter partes review under this chapter pursuant to a petition filed under section 311 within 3 months after—
(1)receiving a preliminary response to the petition under section 313; or
(2)if no such preliminary response is filed, the last date on which such response may be filed.
(c)Notice.—The Director shall notify the petitioner and patent owner, in writ

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC v. Lee
579 U.S. 261 (Supreme Court, 2016)
313 case citations
Credit Acceptance Corp. v. Westlake Services
859 F.3d 1044 (Federal Circuit, 2017)
92 case citations
Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
941 F.3d 1320 (Federal Circuit, 2019)
52 case citations
Shaw Industries Group, Inc. v. Automated Creel Systems, Inc.
817 F.3d 1293 (Federal Circuit, 2016)
46 case citations
Wi-Fi One, LLC v. Broadcom Corporation
878 F.3d 1364 (Federal Circuit, 2018)
35 case citations
Nidec Motor Corporation v. Zhongshan Broad Ocean Motor Co
868 F.3d 1013 (Federal Circuit, 2017)
15 case citations
Zachary Silbersher v. Valeant Pharmaceuticals Int'l
89 F.4th 1154 (Ninth Circuit, 2023)
9 case citations
GEA Process Engineering, Inc. v. Steuben Foods, Inc.
618 F. App'x 667 (Federal Circuit, 2015)
3 case citations
Hekmati v. United States
51 F.4th 1066 (Federal Circuit, 2022)
2 case citations
Virginia Innovation Sciences, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.
983 F. Supp. 2d 713 (E.D. Virginia, 2014)
2 case citations
Koninklijke Philips N v. v. Iancu
(Federal Circuit, 2020)
US Inventor v. Vidal
(Fifth Circuit, 2022)
In re Schott Gemtron Corp.
617 F. App'x 994 (Federal Circuit, 2015)

Source Credit

History

(Added Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4604(a)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–568; amended Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title III, §13202(a)(3), (c)(1), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1901, 1902; Pub. L. 112–29, §6(a), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 300.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Amendments
2011—Pub. L. 112–29 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section related to conduct of inter partes reexamination proceedings.
2002—Pub. L. 107–273, §13202(c)(1), made technical correction to directory language of Pub. L. 106–113, which enacted this section.
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 107–273, §13202(a)(3), redesignated par. (2) as (1), substituted "the Office shall send to the third-party requester a copy" for "the third-party requester shall receive a copy", redesignated par. (3) as (2), and struck out former par. (1) which read as follows: "This subsection shall apply to any inter partes reexamination proceeding in which the order for inter partes reexamination is based upon a request by a third-party requester."

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 2011 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 112–29 effective upon the expiration of the 1-year period beginning on Sept. 16, 2011, and applicable to any patent issued before, on, or after that effective date, with provisions for graduated implementation, see section 6(c)(2) of Pub. L. 112–29, set out as a note under section 311 of this title.

Effective Date
Section effective Nov. 29, 1999, and applicable to any patent issuing from an original application filed in the United States on or after that date, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4608(a)] of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as an Effective Date of 1999 Amendment note under section 41 of this title.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 U.S.C. § 314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/35/314.