FEDERAL · 35 U.S.C. · Chapter 31
Institution of inter partes review
35 U.S.C. § 314
Title35 — Patents
Chapter31 — INTER PARTES REVIEW
This text of 35 U.S.C. § 314 (Institution of inter partes review) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
35 U.S.C. § 314.
Text
(a)Threshold.—The Director may not authorize an inter partes review to be instituted unless the Director determines that the information presented in the petition filed under section 311 and any response filed under section 313 shows that there is a reasonable likelihood that the petitioner would prevail with respect to at least 1 of the claims challenged in the petition.
(b)Timing.—The Director shall determine whether to institute an inter partes review under this chapter pursuant to a petition filed under section 311 within 3 months after—
(1)receiving a preliminary response to the petition under section 313; or
(2)if no such preliminary response is filed, the last date on which such response may be filed.
(c)Notice.—The Director shall notify the petitioner and patent owner, in writ
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC v. Lee
579 U.S. 261 (Supreme Court, 2016)
Credit Acceptance Corp. v. Westlake Services
859 F.3d 1044 (Federal Circuit, 2017)
Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
941 F.3d 1320 (Federal Circuit, 2019)
Shaw Industries Group, Inc. v. Automated Creel Systems, Inc.
817 F.3d 1293 (Federal Circuit, 2016)
Wi-Fi One, LLC v. Broadcom Corporation
878 F.3d 1364 (Federal Circuit, 2018)
Nidec Motor Corporation v. Zhongshan Broad Ocean Motor Co
868 F.3d 1013 (Federal Circuit, 2017)
Zachary Silbersher v. Valeant Pharmaceuticals Int'l
89 F.4th 1154 (Ninth Circuit, 2023)
GEA Process Engineering, Inc. v. Steuben Foods, Inc.
618 F. App'x 667 (Federal Circuit, 2015)
Hekmati v. United States
51 F.4th 1066 (Federal Circuit, 2022)
Virginia Innovation Sciences, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.
983 F. Supp. 2d 713 (E.D. Virginia, 2014)
AstraZeneca AB v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(N.D. West Virginia, 2021)
Camelbak Products, LLC v. Zak Designs, Inc.
(W.D. Arkansas, 2022)
Fall Line Patents, LLC v. Unified Patents, LLC
(Federal Circuit, 2022)
Koninklijke Philips N v. v. Iancu
(Federal Circuit, 2020)
US Inventor v. Vidal
(Fifth Circuit, 2022)
Pauline Newman v. Kimberly Moore
(D.C. Circuit, 2025)
In re Schott Gemtron Corp.
617 F. App'x 994 (Federal Circuit, 2015)
VPR Brands LP v. Jupiter Research LLC
(D. Arizona, 2022)
Kamstrup A/S v. Axioma Metering UAB
(D. Colorado, 2019)
Centripetal Networks, LLC v. Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
(Federal Circuit, 2025)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4604(a)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–568; amended Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title III, §13202(a)(3), (c)(1), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1901, 1902; Pub. L. 112–29, §6(a), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 300.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2011—Pub. L. 112–29 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section related to conduct of inter partes reexamination proceedings.
2002—Pub. L. 107–273, §13202(c)(1), made technical correction to directory language of Pub. L. 106–113, which enacted this section.
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 107–273, §13202(a)(3), redesignated par. (2) as (1), substituted "the Office shall send to the third-party requester a copy" for "the third-party requester shall receive a copy", redesignated par. (3) as (2), and struck out former par. (1) which read as follows: "This subsection shall apply to any inter partes reexamination proceeding in which the order for inter partes reexamination is based upon a request by a third-party requester."
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2011 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 112–29 effective upon the expiration of the 1-year period beginning on Sept. 16, 2011, and applicable to any patent issued before, on, or after that effective date, with provisions for graduated implementation, see section 6(c)(2) of Pub. L. 112–29, set out as a note under section 311 of this title.
Effective Date
Section effective Nov. 29, 1999, and applicable to any patent issuing from an original application filed in the United States on or after that date, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4608(a)] of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as an Effective Date of 1999 Amendment note under section 41 of this title.
Amendments
2011—Pub. L. 112–29 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section related to conduct of inter partes reexamination proceedings.
2002—Pub. L. 107–273, §13202(c)(1), made technical correction to directory language of Pub. L. 106–113, which enacted this section.
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 107–273, §13202(a)(3), redesignated par. (2) as (1), substituted "the Office shall send to the third-party requester a copy" for "the third-party requester shall receive a copy", redesignated par. (3) as (2), and struck out former par. (1) which read as follows: "This subsection shall apply to any inter partes reexamination proceeding in which the order for inter partes reexamination is based upon a request by a third-party requester."
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2011 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 112–29 effective upon the expiration of the 1-year period beginning on Sept. 16, 2011, and applicable to any patent issued before, on, or after that effective date, with provisions for graduated implementation, see section 6(c)(2) of Pub. L. 112–29, set out as a note under section 311 of this title.
Effective Date
Section effective Nov. 29, 1999, and applicable to any patent issuing from an original application filed in the United States on or after that date, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4608(a)] of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as an Effective Date of 1999 Amendment note under section 41 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
35 U.S.C. § 314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/35/314.